2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fairness of prices, user fee policy and willingness to pay among visitors to a national forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is always the issue as to how much tax to charge, since if this tax is considered excessive, it might also adversely impact demand for lodgings, thus causing a hidden cost in the form of declining sales and overall tax revenue. By contrast, the perceived fairness with regard to tourism tax seems to be of a particular importance as travelers' behavior may be significantly influenced by their respective fairness perceptions (Chung et al 2011). Fairness is a psychological perception of what is just or honest (Stapel 1972).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is always the issue as to how much tax to charge, since if this tax is considered excessive, it might also adversely impact demand for lodgings, thus causing a hidden cost in the form of declining sales and overall tax revenue. By contrast, the perceived fairness with regard to tourism tax seems to be of a particular importance as travelers' behavior may be significantly influenced by their respective fairness perceptions (Chung et al 2011). Fairness is a psychological perception of what is just or honest (Stapel 1972).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "entry fee" is sometimes called a "barrier" because those management strategies reduce visitor congestion with a fee, which presumably discourages those who value the attraction less (Lindberg, 2001;Reynisdottir et al, 2008;Ahmad, 2009;Chung et al, 2011;Watson, 2013). According to Reynisdottir et al (2008), in the absence of visitors' fees, nonusers actually "subsidize" the users who visit attractions as "free riders".…”
Section: Protected Areas Feementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the entry fee amount must be evidence-based and match WTP for both domestic and foreign visitors (Shahabuddin, 2009). Earlier studies have concluded that most visitors are ready to pay to enter to frequently visited natural areas (e.g., Abala, 1987;Depondt and Green, 2006;Baral et al, 2008;Svensson et al, 2008;Reynisdottir et al, 2008;Uyarra et al, 2010;Peters and Hawkins, 2009;Thur, 2010;Gupta and Mythili, 2011;Chung et al, 2011;Dhakal et al, 2012). Many studies, however, showed that visitors WTP in several cases are higher than the existing fee (such as Riley et al, 2006;Thur, 2010;Asafu-Adjaye and Tapsuwan 2008;Peters and Hawkins, 2009;Szell and Hallett IV 2013;Tyrväinen et al, 2014;Baral and Dhungana, 2014;Vincent et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concepts are fairness and corporate social responsibility (CSR), known to influence consumer satisfaction and purchase intentions of products in other industrial sectors (Xia et al, 2004;Webb et al, 2008). Previous empirical findings from other industrial sectors show that fairness perceptions explain consumer satisfaction, favorable attitudes towards the supplier (e.g., Webb et al, 2008), willingness to pay for goods or services (e.g., Chung et al, 2011), and eventually purchase intentions (e.g., Schein, 2002). Accordingly, we postulate three hypotheses about the linkage between fairness and transit use:…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%