Fair sharing is just caring: Links between justice sensitivity and distributive behavior in middle childhood

Strauß, Sophie; Bondü, Rebecca

doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105561

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In line with previous research pointing to children's and adults' positive attitudes towards forgiving victims and preferences for forgiving over unforgiving victims , our participants tended to view positive outcomes as most likely in the aftermath of forgiveness. The nding that participants across our three age groups tended to view negative outcomes as more likely in the aftermath of punishment also aligns with some previous work showing that children negatively evaluate victims who engage in second-party punishment and prefer alternative response strategies to punishment when making third-party decisions (e.g., Strauß & Bondü, 2022;Yang, Wu, & Dunham, 2021). The results from the present study generate several important theoretical questions.…”

Section: Key Findingssupporting

confidence: 88%

“…The lack of insight from existing work into children's expectations following intervention makes it di cult to understand what factors children may be taking into account as they weigh their decisions to punish or enact an alternative response. Some work suggests that even though children punish when they are victims of a transgression, they negatively evaluate second-party punishment (Strauß & Bondü, 2022). This tension makes it particularly critical and interesting to explore what children expect to occur in the aftermath of punishment and to directly compare these expectations with those associated with forgiveness or doing nothing.…”

Section: Punishmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan

McLaughlin,

Marshall,

McAuliffe

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding how to respond to transgressions is central to cooperation, yet little is known about how individuals understand the consequences of these responses. Accordingly, the current study explored children’s (ages 5-9), adolescents’ (ages 11-14), and adults’ (N = 544, predominantly White, ~50% female, tested in 2021) understandings of three such responses¾forgiveness, punishment, and doing nothing. At all ages, participants differentiated between the consequences of these three responses. Forgiveness was associated with more positive and fewer negative outcomes, while the opposite was true for punishment and doing nothing. With age, participants were less likely to expect positive outcomes, and this effect was strongest for punishment and doing nothing. The results of this study allow novel insights into reasoning about three important response strategies.

show abstract

Section: Key Findingssupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Punishmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan

McLaughlin,

Marshall,

McAuliffe

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous studies have shown that social norms affect human sharing behaviors (Wei et al, 2023), with morality and reputation being two important foundation. Sharing behaviors that conform to social norms is crucial for establishing and maintaining social relationships (Strauß and Bondü, 2023). The differences in sharing behaviors between human-robot teams and human teams may stem from considerations of moral rules.…”

Section: Discussion Of Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Any sharing behaviors within a team are influenced by morality, which affects the resource allocation of individuals as sharers between two or more parties (Strauß and Bondü, 2023). Malle and Scheutz summarized the ethics that people should follow when sharing, one of which is to prohibit behaviors that harm others for their own benefit (Malle and Scheutz, 2019).…”

Section: Morality In Human-robot Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of morality and reputation on sharing behaviors in human-robot teams

Chen,

Hu,

Zhai

2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe relationship between robots and humans is becoming increasingly close and will become an inseparable part of work and life with humans and robots working together. Sharing, which involves distributing goods between individuals and others, involves individuals as potential beneficiaries and the possibility of giving up the interests of others. In human teams, individual sharing behaviors are influenced by morality and reputation. However, the impact on individuals’ sharing behaviors in human-robot collaborative teams remains unclear-individuals may consider morality and reputation differently when sharing with robot or human partners. In this study, three experiments were conducted using the dictator game paradigm, aiming to compare the effects and mechanisms of morality and reputation on sharing behaviors in human and human-robot teams.MethodsExperiment 1 involving 18 participants was conducted. Experiment 2 involving 74 participants was conducted. Experiment 3 involving 128 participants was conducted.ResultsExperiment 1 validated the differences in human sharing behaviors when the agents were robots and humans. Experiment 2 verifies that moral constraints and reputation constraints affect sharing behaviors in human-robot teams. Experiment 3 further reveals the mechanism of differences in sharing behaviors in human-robot teams, where reputation concern plays a mediating role in the impact of moral constraint on sharing behaviors, and the agent type plays a moderating role in the impact of moral constraint on reputation concern and sharing behaviors.DiscussionThe results of this study contribute to a better understanding of the interaction mechanism of human-robot teams. In the future, the formulation of human-robot collaborative team rules and the setting of interaction environments can consider the potential motivation of human behavior from both morality and reputation perspectives and achieve better work performance.

show abstract

“…In line with developments in social justice research (e.g., Schlösser et al, 2018;Strauß and Bondü, 2022), assessments of the justice orientation of human resource management practices are expected to be influenced by self-versus other-oriented justice sensitivities. Whereas victim sensitivity represents self-oriented justice sensitivity, the other-oriented sensitivities are often studied together (e.g., Fetchenhauer and Huang, 2004;Schlösser et al, 2018;Strauß and Bondü, 2022), or with only one of three facets used to represent an other-orientation (e.g., Tham et al, 2019). Using the first approach, we combined observer, beneficiary, and perpetrator sensitivities to represent the other-orientation.…”

Section: Self and Other Sensitivities And Human Resource Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Haines,

Patient,

Guerrero

2024

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionAlthough fairness is a pervasive and ongoing concern in organizations, the fairness of human resource management practices is often overlooked. This study examines how individual differences in justice sensitivity influence the extent to which human resource management practices are perceived to convey principles of organizational justice.MethodsAnalysis was performed on a matching sample of 283 university students from three academic units in two countries having responded at two time points. Justice sensitivity was measured with the 40-item inventory developed and validated by Schmitt et al. (2010). Respondents were instructed to indicate to what extent each of 61 human resource management practices generally conveys principles of organizational justice.ResultsJustice sensitivity was positively associated with subsequent assessments of the justice contents of human resource management practices. The distinction between self-oriented and other-oriented justice sensitivities was helpful in determining perceptions of these human resource management practices and of a subset of pay-for-performance practices.DiscussionThe findings inform current research about the meanings borne by human resource management practices, and also increase understanding of entity judgment formation as an important aspect of systemic justice.

show abstract

Fair sharing is just caring: Links between justice sensitivity and distributive behavior in middle childhood

Cited by 6 publications

References 82 publications

Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan

Developing conceptions of forgiveness across the lifespan

Effects of morality and reputation on sharing behaviors in human-robot teams

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About