Civic engagement, which is presented as teaching, research, and service in and with the community, presents new challenges for evaluating faculty work as part of the reappointment, promotion, and tenure process. The nature of service learning, professional service, and participatory action research are examined as faculty work that can be scholarly (i.e., wellinformed) and the basis of scholarship (i.e., contributing to a knowledge base). As such, examples of evidence for documenting the work and issues associated with evaluating dossiers are presented.
Engagement 3The Scholarship of Civic Engagement: Defining, Documenting and Evaluating Faculty Work Much of faculty work occurs on campus: teaching in classrooms, service to the university and discipline or profession, and research. However, each of these can also occur off campus when instructors deliver courses at remote sites, faculty provide professional services to the community (e.g., serving on boards, contributing to a government task force, consulting), and researchers collect data in communities. Figure 1 illustrates how community involvement is related to the traditional areas of faculty work. Although not part of this diagram, the intersection of teaching, research, and service in the community can occur when a faculty member designs and implements courses that use participatory action research. Community involvement can occur in all sectors of society (e.g., nonprofit, government, business) and has no geographic boundaries.We differentiate between the terms "community involvement" and "civic engagement" in the following way: community involvement is defined primarily by location and includes faculty work that occurs in communities and in clinical settings either on or off campus. Civic engagement is a subset of community involvement and is defined by both location as well as process (it occurs not only in but also with the community). According to this distinction, civic engagement develops partnerships that possess integrity and that emphasize participatory, collaborative, and democratic processes (e.g., design, implementation, assessment) that provide benefits to all constituencies, and thus, encompass service to the community. Civic engagement is consistent with many reinterpretations of community involvement that focus on the importance of reciprocity as a new model for these activities (e.g., Bringle et al., 1999a; Kellogg Commission, 1999). This distinction between community involvement and civic engagement is consistent with Boyer's call for fundamental changes in the structure and behavior of the Engagement 4 academy. Furthermore, it is also consistent with Rice's (1996) observation that faculty work is moving from the an emphasis on autonomous, individualistic work to collaborative, interdisciplinary work, and changing from the isolated character of higher education to a more public and democratic approach to academic work.This chapter focuses on one set of implications from this shift in perspective to civic engagement: How should...