“…Within the technological anticorruption strategies, IS scholars have maintained that digitalization of government's services via e‐government (Kim, 2013; Neupane, Soar, & Vaidya, 2012), Internet diffusion (Andersen, Bentzen, Dalgaard, & Selaya, 2011), social media, and mobile phones (Bertot, Jaeger, & Grimes, 2010; Hellström, 2010) can curb the public sector corruption when we leverage the transparency and accountability affordances of such technologies. However, IS scholars (eg, Martinez, 2014; Saxena, 2017) reveal that IS adoption (ie, implementation and use) has provided new opportunities for corrupt bureaucrats to misuse for personal gains (Kim, 2013). Consequently, the introduction of IS as anticorruption strategy has given rise to a form of corruption known as misuse of IS for corrupt practices (Inuwa, Ononiwu, et al, 2019).…”