Factorial structure and internal consistency of the Russian version of Teachers Creativity Nurturing Behavior Scale (TCNB)

Abstract

Creativity is valued as one of the key 21st-century skills. Though the importance of creativity and creativity nurturing is well-accepted yet it remains the unachieved standard for educational systems.Various factors contribute to fostering creative behavior but the role of a teacher is critical and crucial in nurturing the creative potential of the child. Thecurrent study aimsto adapt the Teachers Creativity Nurturing Behavior Scale (TCNB) in Russian and evaluate its psychometric properties. Factorial structure and internal consistency of the Russian TCNB were examined in the sample of 223 school teachers from 86 towns and rural areas of the Russian Federation and the Commonwealth of Independent States countries (88.8% females, Mage = 36.91, SDage = 10.57). The teaching experience of participants varied from 1 to 43 years (M = 14.39, SD = 10.58). The factorial structure of the TCNB was assessed by exploratory factor analysis, and the internal consistency was estimated by the omega coefficient. Results showed that the four-factor structure was the most appropriate given the data. The value of internal consistency reliability variedfrom .62 to .83 for different factors, providing evidence of acceptable consistency of the scale. Overall, this study demonstrated preliminary evidence of the psychometrical characteristics of the Russian TCNB. The discrepancies between English and Russian versions of TCNB, limitations of the study, and future research perspectives are discussed.

Influence of Organizational Innovation Climate on Creativity and the Mediating Role of Feedback-Seeking Behavior—A Case Study of University Teachers in Hebei, China

“…The lack of a favorable environment that inspires creativity limits the creative behavior of individuals (Zhang et al, 2011). This highlights the significance of creating an organizational innovation climate in the context of increasingly fierce competition in higher education (Muftahu & Jamil, 2021;Sharma et al, 2021). A friendly (Stinkeste et al, 2021), tolerant (Y.…”