2016
DOI: 10.1590/1413-82712016210204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices

Abstract: This study's objective was to verify the factor structure of Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM). The database used included the responses of 1,279 children, 50.2% of which were males with an average age of 8.48 years old and a standard deviation of 1.49 yrs. Confirmatory factor analyses were run to test seven models based on CPM theory and on a Brazilian study addressing the test's structure. The results did not confirm the CPM theoretical proposition concerning the scales but indicated that the test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a non-verbal test that has been used extensively as a culturally fair test of intelligence. Non—verbal intelligence and fluid cognitive abilities are responsible for memory performance, processing, problem-solving, and reasoning, essential for school-age children in learning and academic achievement [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a non-verbal test that has been used extensively as a culturally fair test of intelligence. Non—verbal intelligence and fluid cognitive abilities are responsible for memory performance, processing, problem-solving, and reasoning, essential for school-age children in learning and academic achievement [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It presents good psychometric qualities, inferred by construct validity, internal consistency, with item-total correlation between 0.30 and 0.80 for most items, as well as precision, inter-item coefficient of correlation for the total sample equal to 0.92 (Angelini et al, 1999). Children presenting potential cognitive deficits, who presented percentiles lower than 25, were excluded from the study (Muniz, Gomes, & Pasian, 2016), balancing groups according to the percentiles obtained by the children.…”
Section: Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (Raven)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current knowledge about the internal and external validity of the psychological constructs, as well as, the prediction of outcomes are -in essence -based on information from the population or groups of individuals. Important predictors can be cited which their evidence based on population, such as (i) self-regulatory and mediated processes (Cardoso, Seabra, Gomes, & Fonseca, 2019;Dias et al, 2015;Golino, Gomes, Commons & Miller, 2014;Gomes, 2007Gomes, , 2010a; Gomes & Borges, 2009a;Gomes, Golino, Santos, & Ferreira, 2014;Pereira, Golino, M. T. S., & Gomes, 2019;Pires & Gomes, 2018;Reppold et al, 2015), (ii) personality (Gomes, 2012a;Gomes & Gjikuria, 2017;Gomes & Golino, 2012a), (iii) socioeconomics variables Gomes, Amantes & Jelihovschi, 2020;Gomes, Lemos, & Jelihovschi, 2020;Pazeto, Dias, Gomes & Seabra, 2019), (iv) intelligence (Alves, Gomes, Martins, & Almeida, 2016, 2017Golino & Gomes, 2019;Gomes, 2010bGomes, , 2011bGomes, , 2012bGomes & Borges, 2007, 2008b, 2009b, 2009cGomes, de Araújo, Ferreira & Golino, 2014;Gomes & Golino, 2012bMuniz, Gomes, & Pasian, 2016;Valentini et al, 2015), and (v) metacognition (Golino & Gomes, 2014a;Golino, Gomes, & Andrade, 2014;Gomes, Golino, & Menezes, 2014). The predictors with secondary importance follows the same rationality and their evidence are based on population, such as (vi) approaches to learning…”
Section: The Measurement Of the Individual Needs To Be Estimatedmentioning
confidence: 99%