1994
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Independent Activation of rrnB P1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
96
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
96
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the presence of an UP element in a promoter plays the major role of increasing the initial equilibrium constant of closed complex formation between RNAP and promoter DNA (13, 9). However, influences of ␣-UP element interaction on later steps in transcription initiation were also reported (13,14). The location of the UP element with respect to the transcription start site can influence the degree of transcription stimulation (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the presence of an UP element in a promoter plays the major role of increasing the initial equilibrium constant of closed complex formation between RNAP and promoter DNA (13, 9). However, influences of ␣-UP element interaction on later steps in transcription initiation were also reported (13,14). The location of the UP element with respect to the transcription start site can influence the degree of transcription stimulation (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is currently believed that the transcription stimulation by an UP element has to be traced mainly to the cooperation of the sigma factor and the ␣ subunit in RNAP binding to the promoter (1,12). Thus, the presence of an UP element in a promoter plays the major role of increasing the initial equilibrium constant of closed complex formation between RNAP and promoter DNA (13,9). However, influences of ␣-UP element interaction on later steps in transcription initiation were also reported (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The small difference in the mobilities of the wild type and SUB fragments is likely to reflect bending, however, since the difference was greatest when the A-tract regions were near the center of the fragment ( Figure 5, PvuII or XhoI digests). Functional role of A-tracts within the UP element The UP element consists of 90% adenine and thymine residues, contains phased A/T-tracts (Figure 6), and increases transcription of rmB P1 at least 30-fold in vivo and in vitro (2,3). Replacement of the -40 to -60 region in rrnB P1 with the SUB mutation completely eliminates activation by the UP element and partially reduces activation by FIS bound at FIS Site I (3), resulting in a reduction of transcription even greater than 30-fold.…”
Section: A6 Tracts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exceptional strength results from a near consensus core promoter (-10, -35 region) activated more than 300-fold by an upstream activator region (UAR) (1)(2)(3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%