Facing Conspiracies: Biden’s Counter-Speech to Trumpist Messages in the Framework of the 2020 US Elections

Abstract

The climate of division and polarization in the US politics is increasing, going beyond the time in the office of a specific leader. Several political or technological challenges have ended up eroding this trust, making social cohesion difficult. In this context, this research examines the communication strategies of the elected president Biden after the 2020 elections, shedding light on how his legitimacy was built. All the messages that the Democrat published on his personal Twitter account (@JoeBiden) were collected, from the day after the presidential elections (4 November 2020) until his inauguration as president of the United States (20 January 2021). Using a content analysis method on issue/game frame and dissemination of the messages (n = 379), and an analysis of the 100 first keywords, results showed a plan of the Democratic candidate to reinforce the role of public institutions but without interaction with the polarized electorate. In this sense, the strategies of the president-elect related to the promotion of political action, the call for unity, and the fight against the pandemic stood out. The frequent use of words with a positive attitude reveals how Biden avoided confrontation with Donald Trump.

Research on Digital Political Communication: Electoral Campaigns, Disinformation, and Artificial Intelligence

“…First, the relationship between politicians and media through fake news in Chile is one example of this given by Cárcamo-Ulloa et al [14]. Similarly, Pérez-Curiel, Rivas-de-Roca, and Domínguez-García [15] introduced the term "polarization" in the context of the US elections. Polarization is a consequence of fake news fueling political divisions on social networks [16].…”

Global political leaders during the COVID-19 vaccination: Between propaganda and fact-checking

“…Digital political communication fueled a highly polarized media system at the global level (Pérez-Curiel et al, 2022). It is striking that the people ask for a coordinated response to health crises (Tyson et al, 2021), but the chaos of modern public communication makes it difficult to find only one voice.…”