2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-017-6763-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile synthesis of SrFe12O19 nanoparticles and its photocatalyst application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7] Two peaks were observed at 1,472 and 1,073 cm À1 assigned to the stretching vibration of C-O-C and C-N groups, respectively, [7,8] Finally, three weak peaks were observed at 611, 564, and 464 cm À1 to predict the Fe-O, Sr-O, and Gd-O vibration. [6,8,[41][42][43][44][45][46][52][53][54] Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of Gd/SrFe and its Gd/SrFe@SBCs nanocomposite for Gd/SrFe@SBCs, the XRD peaks observed at 2θ value of 20.73 correspond to the pure chitosan and a shoulder peak at 2θ value of 15 correspond to the Schiff base chitosan. [6][7][8]27,28] In addition, the peaks at 2θ value of 28.87, 32.95, 47.17, and 57.02 correspond to the (222), (400), (440), and (622) planes of the cubic phase of Gd 2 O 3 [52][53][54] and those at [41][42][43][44][45][46] The average crystallite sizes of Gd 2 O 3 and SrFe 12 O 19 in Gd/SrFe were calculated at about 51 and 36 nm, respectively, using Scherrer equation, d = 0.94λ/β cosθ, where d is the crystalline size (nm), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation (1.54 Å), β is FWHM, and θ is Bragg's angle.…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[7] Two peaks were observed at 1,472 and 1,073 cm À1 assigned to the stretching vibration of C-O-C and C-N groups, respectively, [7,8] Finally, three weak peaks were observed at 611, 564, and 464 cm À1 to predict the Fe-O, Sr-O, and Gd-O vibration. [6,8,[41][42][43][44][45][46][52][53][54] Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of Gd/SrFe and its Gd/SrFe@SBCs nanocomposite for Gd/SrFe@SBCs, the XRD peaks observed at 2θ value of 20.73 correspond to the pure chitosan and a shoulder peak at 2θ value of 15 correspond to the Schiff base chitosan. [6][7][8]27,28] In addition, the peaks at 2θ value of 28.87, 32.95, 47.17, and 57.02 correspond to the (222), (400), (440), and (622) planes of the cubic phase of Gd 2 O 3 [52][53][54] and those at [41][42][43][44][45][46] The average crystallite sizes of Gd 2 O 3 and SrFe 12 O 19 in Gd/SrFe were calculated at about 51 and 36 nm, respectively, using Scherrer equation, d = 0.94λ/β cosθ, where d is the crystalline size (nm), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation (1.54 Å), β is FWHM, and θ is Bragg's angle.…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,8,[41][42][43][44][45][46][52][53][54] Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of Gd/SrFe and its Gd/SrFe@SBCs nanocomposite for Gd/SrFe@SBCs, the XRD peaks observed at 2θ value of 20.73 correspond to the pure chitosan and a shoulder peak at 2θ value of 15 correspond to the Schiff base chitosan. [6][7][8]27,28] In addition, the peaks at 2θ value of 28.87, 32.95, 47.17, and 57.02 correspond to the (222), (400), (440), and (622) planes of the cubic phase of Gd 2 O 3 [52][53][54] and those at [41][42][43][44][45][46] The average crystallite sizes of Gd 2 O 3 and SrFe 12 O 19 in Gd/SrFe were calculated at about 51 and 36 nm, respectively, using Scherrer equation, d = 0.94λ/β cosθ, where d is the crystalline size (nm), λ is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation (1.54 Å), β is FWHM, and θ is Bragg's angle. DSC thermogram of Gd/SrFe@SBCs (Figure 3) shows an endothermic peak at 82.6 C assigned to evaporation of solvent, [27,28,55] and exothermic peaks at 285.5 C are assigned to the thermal decomposition of C=N, pyranose and aromatic rings of Gd/SrFe@SBCs.…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was important for improving the photocatalytic property of photocatalysts [13][14][15][16]. Many methods have been proven to be effective, such as ion doping methods, the construction of heterojunctions [17][18][19][20][21][22] and photosensitization [23,24]. Among these methods, the construction of composite materials was an active research area in the field of photocatalysts [21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been proven to be effective, such as ion doping methods, the construction of heterojunctions [17][18][19][20][21][22] and photosensitization [23,24]. Among these methods, the construction of composite materials was an active research area in the field of photocatalysts [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. A composite photocatalyst concentrated the effects of a single photocatalyst, which endowed the composite system with higher light utilization efficiency [28][29][30][31][32], longer carrier life, higher photocatalytic property and higher chemical stability [33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%