2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-016-9519-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial composite systems: review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective evaluation of the system is a complex task as it depends on subjective recognition abilities (Zahradníková, Duchovičová, and Schreiber 2016). To overcome this issue we use two separated evaluation metrics:…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective evaluation of the system is a complex task as it depends on subjective recognition abilities (Zahradníková, Duchovičová, and Schreiber 2016). To overcome this issue we use two separated evaluation metrics:…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall is the recollection of information for the composite construction. Recognition is the ability to recognize someone seen before, used during line-ups (Zahradníková, Duchovičová, and Schreiber 2016;Mancusi 2014). Compared to recall, recognition is an easier and stronger task, therefore most courts of law consider lineup identification as good evidence (Mancusi 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is created by an eye witness for whom the face is unfamiliar, and publicised by the police in the hope that it will be recognised by someone who knows the individual concerned. Unfortunately, composites are generally poorly recognised by people who are familiar with the person being portrayed (e.g., Davies & Valentine, ; Frowd, Carson, Ness, McQuiston‐Surrett, et al, ; Frowd, Carson, Ness, Richardson, et al, ; Frowd et al, ; Valentine & Davis, ; Zahradnikova, Duchovicova, & Schreiber, ). Most research on composite construction has consequently focused on identifying the reasons why these systems produce such poor likenesses, in order to improve their effectiveness as an aid for the police (e.g., Brown et al, ; Frowd et al, ; Ness, Hancock, Bowie, Bruce, & Pike, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially those reports can include general descriptions of the suspect appearance, providing information about sex, race and approximate height and age. In some cases, an investigator works with the eyewitness to construct a facial composite of the offender, resulting in an image intended to resemble the facial characteristics of the perpetrator (McQuiston-Surrett, Topp, & Malpass, 2006;Zahradnikova, Duchovicova, & Schreiber, 2016). Those images are then sent to police officers working in the field, in order to narrow the investigation of suspects and assist on the identification of perpetrators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial composites are created with the purpose of reducing the number of suspects and to help identify a perpetrator, relying on someone's ability to recognize his or her face (Zahradnikova et al, 2016). Accurate composites work well as an investigative tool, but unfortunately an extensive literature shows that eyewitness memory can also be unreliable (Lindsay, Mansour, Kalmet, Bertrand, & Melsom, 2011;Lindsay et al, 2013;Memon, Mastroberardino, & Fraser, 2008), and that composites generated by eyewitnesses are usually not easily recognized (Davies & Valentine, 2013;Wells & Hasel, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%