2002
DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2002.1000134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face recognition with radial basis function (RBF) neural networks

Abstract: A general and efficient design approach using a radial basis function (RBF) neural classifier to cope with small training sets of high dimension, which is a problem frequently encountered in face recognition, is presented. In order to avoid overfitting and reduce the computational burden, face features are first extracted by the principal component analysis (PCA) method. Then, the resulting features are further processed by the Fisher's linear discriminant (FLD) technique to acquire lower-dimensional discrimin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error rate of the NFL and CNN are 3.125 and 3.83%, respectively, whereas the error rate of the present method is 2.125%. Another method, face recognition with RBF neural network (Er et al 2002), has shown better performance than the present method (error rate is 1.92%) for the same ORL face database, but it involves huge computational effort due to the reason that it first extracts face features by PCA and then the resulting features are projected into the Fisher's optimal subspace and finally a hybrid learning algorithm is proposed to train the RBF neural networks for classification. Since the present method and method given in Er et al (2002) are using neural networks as classifier, comparison for computational cost is done for feature extraction only.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The error rate of the NFL and CNN are 3.125 and 3.83%, respectively, whereas the error rate of the present method is 2.125%. Another method, face recognition with RBF neural network (Er et al 2002), has shown better performance than the present method (error rate is 1.92%) for the same ORL face database, but it involves huge computational effort due to the reason that it first extracts face features by PCA and then the resulting features are projected into the Fisher's optimal subspace and finally a hybrid learning algorithm is proposed to train the RBF neural networks for classification. Since the present method and method given in Er et al (2002) are using neural networks as classifier, comparison for computational cost is done for feature extraction only.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Another method, face recognition with RBF neural network (Er et al 2002), has shown better performance than the present method (error rate is 1.92%) for the same ORL face database, but it involves huge computational effort due to the reason that it first extracts face features by PCA and then the resulting features are projected into the Fisher's optimal subspace and finally a hybrid learning algorithm is proposed to train the RBF neural networks for classification. Since the present method and method given in Er et al (2002) are using neural networks as classifier, comparison for computational cost is done for feature extraction only. The feature extraction for the method described in Er et al (2002) requires O(K(MN) 3 ) (Toygar and Acan 2004) to compute eigenvalues and the corresponding eigenvectors of the covariance matrix, which is constructed from K images of size M 9 N. Next to compute FLD, computational cost is O((MN) 3 ) .…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hai Guo and Jing-ying Zhao have proposed Chinese minority script recognition using radial basis function network [14]. Many researchers have implemented face recognition system using RBF neural network [15,16]. Bicheng Li and Hujun Yin have presented a face recognition system using radial basis function neural network and wavelet transformation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%