2013
DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2013.52013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Recognition Based on Wavelet Packet Coefficients and Radial Basis Function Neural Networks

Abstract: An efficient face recognition system with face image representation using averaged wavelet packet coefficients, compact and meaningful feature vectors dimensional reduction and recognition using radial basis function (RBF) neural network is presented. The face images are decomposed by 2-level two-dimensional (2-D) wavelet packet transformation. The wavelet packet coefficients obtained from the wavelet packet transformation are averaged using two different proposed methods. In the first method, wavelet packet c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SWT row vectors of both frontal and non-frontal reference images are concatenated to produce the final features. Kumar et al, [8] explained average wavelet packet coefficients and Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network to recognize face. The RBF neural network is used to recognize the average wavelet packet coefficients.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SWT row vectors of both frontal and non-frontal reference images are concatenated to produce the final features. Kumar et al, [8] explained average wavelet packet coefficients and Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network to recognize face. The RBF neural network is used to recognize the average wavelet packet coefficients.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the related work of existing face recognition models [1, 2, 6, 7, 9-11, 20, 21], it is observed that the simple pixel level and average level approaches directly affect on the contrast of the image due to blurring effect. The spatial domain approach [8,10] does not have a fixed set of basis vectors hence, the spatial domain fusion produces spectral degradation which affects accuracy of the face model. The final fused images obtained by the transform domain results less spatial resolution which decreases the overall recognition rates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%