2006
DOI: 10.1002/mop.21736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and measurement of rectangular ring with open-ended CPW-fed monopole antenna for 2.4/5.2-GHz WLAN operation

Abstract: A rectangular ring is introduced in an open‐ended planar monopole antenna fed by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) in order to achieve broadband dual‐frequency operation. Prototypes of the proposed antenna designed for WLAN operation in the 2.4‐ and 5.2‐GHz bands are constructed and tested. The maximum measured bandwidth is measured approximately 14.48% and 11.49% (VSWR 1:2), respectively. Good radiation‐pattern characteristics of monopolelike patterns have been obtained. The obtained measured gain is measured to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various CPW-fed antennas have been reported in literature such as multiband [3][4][5][6][7][8], CPW antennas with added strip for WLAN [9][10][11], and asymmetric coplanar strip antennas [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, majority of these designs have large antenna dimensions and do not cover all the major bands of WLAN/WiMAX/LTE [13][14][15][16]18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various CPW-fed antennas have been reported in literature such as multiband [3][4][5][6][7][8], CPW antennas with added strip for WLAN [9][10][11], and asymmetric coplanar strip antennas [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, majority of these designs have large antenna dimensions and do not cover all the major bands of WLAN/WiMAX/LTE [13][14][15][16]18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual technology for size reduction is meandering. The strips responsible for the lower band are meandered into different shapes, such as triangle shape [1], U-shape [2,3], and ring shape [4][5][6]. Introducing the coupling between different strips responsible for the different bands is another technology for size reduction [3,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a great interest in coplanar waveguide (CPW) has been presented because of its many features, such as the simplest structure of a single metallic layer, easy fabrications, lower surface wave loss and smaller occupation. Rectangular ring CPW-fed antennas are capable of providing operation bandwidth for 2.4/5.2 GHz WLAN [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%