2017
DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20172176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye donation: awareness and willingness among shopkeepers

Abstract: Background: Corneal blindness is one of the important causes of blindness in India that can be conventionally cured by corneal transplantation. The number of corneal transplants done is less than the actual requirement in India due to inadequate number of corneas collected. Therefore increasing awareness regarding eye donation and also willingness to pledge for the same is the today’s need. Hence current study was undertaken to assess the awareness regarding eye donation and the willingness to pledge the eye f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, 40.4 %( 192) knew the ideal time limit of eye donation was within 6 hours of death, which is in accordance with that of Patil et al(36.5%), Marathe et al(44.7%) Tiwari et al, (50%), [6,14,18] whereas it is low in comparison to the observations of Bhandarey et al (88%) , Goerge et al(79.5%) [15,16] .It is important for the general public to be aware of the time limit for eye donation after death,as eyes can not be utilised for optical purpose that are donated after 6 hours of death. (Table-II) 43.1%(195) of our participants thought that eye donation means removal of cornea which is similar to the study done by Ronaki et al(54.9%) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, 40.4 %( 192) knew the ideal time limit of eye donation was within 6 hours of death, which is in accordance with that of Patil et al(36.5%), Marathe et al(44.7%) Tiwari et al, (50%), [6,14,18] whereas it is low in comparison to the observations of Bhandarey et al (88%) , Goerge et al(79.5%) [15,16] .It is important for the general public to be aware of the time limit for eye donation after death,as eyes can not be utilised for optical purpose that are donated after 6 hours of death. (Table-II) 43.1%(195) of our participants thought that eye donation means removal of cornea which is similar to the study done by Ronaki et al(54.9%) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(Table-II) 43.1%(195) of our participants thought that eye donation means removal of cornea which is similar to the study done by Ronaki et al(54.9%) . [9] 49.5 %( 224) knew that eye donation does not cause disfigurement as artificial prosthesis was given after collection of cornea which is similar to the study by Patil et al (39%), [6] Lawlor et al [19] and low in comparison to Ronaki et al (73.5%)and Bhandary et al(76.2%). [9,15] 43.1%(195)were aware that spectacle users,diabetics,hypertensives and post cataract surgery persons can donate their eyes, which is similar to the study of Ronaki et al(45.4%) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations