2020
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745-123.2.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremely low genetic diversity of Stigonema associated with Stereocaulon in eastern Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent molecular analyses have shown an extremely low genetic diversity in Stigonema across temperate, boreal and tundra biomes (Lavoie et al . 2020), without mycobiont specificity. The vnfDG sequences from Stigonema form a monophyletic group (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent molecular analyses have shown an extremely low genetic diversity in Stigonema across temperate, boreal and tundra biomes (Lavoie et al . 2020), without mycobiont specificity. The vnfDG sequences from Stigonema form a monophyletic group (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike reindeer lichens, Stereocaulon species have a mutualistic association with cyanobacteria, mainly from the genus Stigonema, which are located in cephalodia (Huss-Danell 1977, 1979; Kershaw 1978; Kytöviita & Crittenden 2002; Lavoie et al . 2020). In Canada, acetylene reduction assays on Stereocaulon cyanobacteria have demonstrated their critical contribution to the nitrogen (N) budget (Crittenden & Kershaw 1978; Kershaw 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might argue that the low genetic diversity of the Rhizonema photobionts was a by‐product of the short 16S fragment we obtained for a marker that is relatively conserved (Woese & Fox, 1977) and commonly used to infer broader cyanobacterial phylogenies (Elvebakk et al., 2008; Miadlikowska et al., 2014; O’Brien, 2013; O’Brien et al., 2005; Svenning et al., 2005). However, the rbc LX, another marker frequently employed in cyanobacterial phylogenetics (Lavoie et al., 2020; Magain et al., 2017, 2018; Miadlikowska et al., 2014; O’Brien et al., 2005, 2013), also exhibited low divergence for those samples where it could be amplified. Even the longer pieces of 16S amplified for selected samples did not alter our conclusions about the phylogenetic structure in Rhizonema .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of lichen photobionts have mostly focused on green‐algal photobionts in so‐called chlorolichens (Grande et al., 2018; Leavitt et al., 2015; Muggia et al., 2020), whereas studies of cyanolichens have been far more limited (e.g. Lavoie et al., 2020; Magain et al., 2017; Otálora et al., 2010). Cyanolichens are obligate associations between lichen‐forming fungi and cyanobacteria and can be classified into two artificial groups (Rikkinen, 2017): bipartite lichens, with one mycobiont and one cyanobacterial photobiont; and tripartite lichens, where one mycobiont associates simultaneously with a green‐algal and a cyanobacterial photobiont, either forming chimeric thalli (photosymbiodemes) or with the cyanobionts restricted to cephalodia, pocket‐like structures in the thallus (Rikkinen, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the term holobiont (Margulis, 1991) favoured the studies and promoted a holistic view on symbiotic interactions where several species are considered (Vandenkoornhuyse et al ., 2015; Faure et al ., 2018; Hassani et al ., 2018; Simon et al ., 2019). Among non-model organisms, lichens are the symbiotic organism “par excellence”, because of a partnership between fungi (one-several species), green algae, cyanobacteria and numerous bacteria in a multi-species symbiosis (Aschenbrenner et al ., 2016; Lavoie et al ., 2020). While the interactions between algae/cyanobacteria have been intensively studied, the role of bacteria in the symbiosis is still in its infancy (Grube et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%