“…Previously, we found that the 109-nt 39TE, in trans, inhibited translation of a reporter gene carrying the 39TE in cis (Wang et al+, 1997)+ Therefore, we tested the ability of the 109-nt 39TE RNA to inhibit translation of genomic and sgRNA1 in trans+ A 100-fold molar excess of the 39TE RNA inhibited translation of gRNA by 50%, whereas four times as much 39TE RNA was required to inhibit translation of sgRNA1 by 50% (Fig+ 4A)+ The defective 39TE RNA containing the filled-in BamHI 4837 site (39TEBF RNA) was far less inhibitory of either mRNA (Fig+ 4A)+ A 300-fold excess of 39TE RNA reduced translation of the 39-kDa product of ORF 1 from gRNA by sixfold (Fig+ 4B, lanes 2-3), whereas translation of coat protein from sgRNA1 was only halved (Fig+ 4B, lanes 5-6)+ Most strikingly, when equal amounts of genomic and sgRNA1 were present in the same reaction, presence of excess 39TE RNA dropped gRNA translation by 11-fold, whereas translation of sgRNA1 was reduced by only 20% (Fig+ 4B, lanes 8-9)+ In all cases, the defective 39TE had little effect on the translation from genomic RNA or sgRNA1 in trans+ (The apparent inhibition of gRNA by 39TEBF RNA in Fig+ 4A and apparent stimulation in Fig+ 4B, lane 4, reflects experimental variation (632%)+ Inhibition greater than twofold is considered significant+) Thus, the transinhibition requires a functional 39TE sequence and it specifically inhibits gRNA much more than sgRNA1+ sgRNA2 accumulates to a 20-40-fold molar excess over genomic RNA in infected cells (Kelly et al+, 1994;Mohan et al+, 1995;Koev et al+, 1998)+ The ratio of sgRNA2 to translatable gRNA is even greater than that seen on Northern blots, because much of the genomic RNA is encapsidated (Mohan et al+, 1995) and thus sequestered from translation+ Because the 39TE comprises the complete 59 UTR of sgRNA2, it is possible that sgRNA2 inhibits translation of genomic and sgRNA1 in trans+ Because of the preferential inhibition of gRNA versus sgRNA1, we propose that as sgRNA2 accumulates, translation of gRNA is reduced, favoring translation of sgRNA1 late in infection+ To test this hypothesis, the effect of sgRNA2 on translation of gRNA and sgRNA1 was evaluated as in the previous experiment+ As predicted, sgRNA2 inhibited translation of the genomic RNA more effectively than it inhibited translation FIGURE 3. Cap-independent translation of capped (C) and uncapped (U) subgenomic RNAs+ A: Wheat germ translation products of sgRNA1 (map at top), which was transcribed from pSG1 linearized with ScaI (lanes 3, 4), Pst I (lanes 5, 6) or SmaI (lanes 7, 8)+ Proteins were analyzed by 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis+ Lanes 9 and 10 are the products of SmaI-cut pSG1BF transcript that contains the GAUC duplication in the BamHI 4837 site of the 39TE+ Lanes 11 and 12 show translation products of SmaI-cut pSP17 transcript in which the 59-terminal 99 nt of the 188-nt 59 UTR of sgRNA1 were deleted+ Mobilities of products of ORFs 3 (22 kDa), 4 (17 kDa) and 3ϩ5 (72 kDa, made by the in-frame read-through of the ORF 3 stop codon) are indicated at right+ Other bands indicate cleavage products of the labile 72-kDa protein (Filichkin et al+, 1994) and premature termination products within ORF 5 (Brown et al+, 1996)+ Relative moles of translation product (of ORF 3) determined with a Phosphorimager using ImageQuant software are indicated below each lane+ Samples in lanes 9-10 and 11-12 were from different experiments, and the products of the 100% standard (capped SmaI-cut pSG1 transcript) for these are not shown+ B: Products of transcripts from SmaI-cut pSG2 (lanes 2, 3) and pSG2BF (lanes 4, 5), following electrophoresis on a 10% polyacrylamide gel+ Mo...…”