1942
DOI: 10.1021/i560108a023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction and Assay of Nicotinic Acid from Animal and Plant Tissues. Comparison of Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…James, Norris & Wokes (1947) confirmed Melnick's findings with acid extraction for low-extraction flour, and extended them to maize and yeast, using a modified chemical method which gave satisfactory agreement with microbiological assays for whole wheat, barley and other foods. Various American workers (Oser, Melnick & Siegel, 1941;Cheldelin & Williams, 1942;Krehl & Strong, 1944) have reported the presence in cereals of so-called precursors of nicotinic acid which, although water-soluble, are inactive microbiologically. Hydrolysis with acid or alkali, or enzyme treatment converts these 'precursors' into microbiologically active substances.…”
Section: I948mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…James, Norris & Wokes (1947) confirmed Melnick's findings with acid extraction for low-extraction flour, and extended them to maize and yeast, using a modified chemical method which gave satisfactory agreement with microbiological assays for whole wheat, barley and other foods. Various American workers (Oser, Melnick & Siegel, 1941;Cheldelin & Williams, 1942;Krehl & Strong, 1944) have reported the presence in cereals of so-called precursors of nicotinic acid which, although water-soluble, are inactive microbiologically. Hydrolysis with acid or alkali, or enzyme treatment converts these 'precursors' into microbiologically active substances.…”
Section: I948mentioning
confidence: 99%