1974
DOI: 10.1080/00949657408810084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of a monte-carlo comparison of some properties of two rank correlation coefficients in small samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which, for large n, is Whether r S orτ is preferable depends upon the criteria employed to make the judgment; Chow et al [3] judged r S to be the preferable estimator. Spearman's [19,20] introduction of correlation between ranks was accompanied by a correlation measure of which he was fond, the "Spearman footrule", based upon…”
Section: Other Rank Correlation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which, for large n, is Whether r S orτ is preferable depends upon the criteria employed to make the judgment; Chow et al [3] judged r S to be the preferable estimator. Spearman's [19,20] introduction of correlation between ranks was accompanied by a correlation measure of which he was fond, the "Spearman footrule", based upon…”
Section: Other Rank Correlation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, differences greater than two standard errors are deemed significant corresponding to an asymptotic significance level of approximately 0.05. For our second comparison, we let y be the correlation coefficient of a bivariate normal distribution and we consider tests of significance based on the Kendall rank correlation coefficient, K, and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, S. Chow, Miller and Dickinson (1974) compared these power functions but were unable to determine which procedure is preferable. To facilitate such comparisons, we performed randomized tests (cr=0.05) and use the more accurate estimate of standard error, SE(C).…”
Section: 'Greater Than 2 Se(c)mentioning
confidence: 99%