Extended model for irradiation suitable for large bifacial PV power plants

Durković, Vladan; Đurišić, Željko

doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.064

Cited by 20 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Basically, solar cells are silicon (Si) materials. [19]. With the presence of diodes in solar cells and the occurrence of p-n junctions, sunlight can produce electrical energy.…”

Section: B Pv Power Plant Conversion Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Peak Power Capacity on Rooftop Solar PV 1.25 kWp at Sun Conditions 90 Degrees

Satria

Syafii

Aswardi

2021

IJEEPSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes the optimization of energy conversion when solar radiation occurs at peak power conditions, namely at 11.00 am to 2.00 pm where the position of the sun is parallel to the layout of the PV Rooftop installation. The panels used are 5 units with the type of polycrystalline with a capacity of 1 panel unit consisting of 250 Wp. The position of the panels installed on the roof of the Andalas University building is based on an angle of 90o degrees with a position of ±255m above sea level. The advantages obtained when placed on the roof of the building are due to the minimal impact of shadow effects and environmental disturbances. Data retrieval using DC current and voltage sensors is then connected to the Arduino Uno microcontroller which is then interfaced in graphic form. Considerations in the installation of PV by reviewing the weather conditions at that time where the conditions were sunny and the air was clean with the aim that the performance when solar radiation entered the solar cells could be produced more optimally. Based on the data obtained at peak power, PV can convert DC power to 972.56 Wp. In the final stage of collecting data recorded on this PC, it can later be used as a reference for installing solar panels for household electricity scales in the West Sumatra region.

show abstract

“…Basically, solar cells are silicon (Si) materials. [19]. With the presence of diodes in solar cells and the occurrence of p-n junctions, sunlight can produce electrical energy.…”

Section: B Pv Power Plant Conversion Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Peak Power Capacity on Rooftop Solar PV 1.25 kWp at Sun Conditions 90 Degrees

Satria

Syafii

Aswardi

2021

IJEEPSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The view factor to shaded ground of the front side of the collector B is calculated based on equation (9) and Fig. 2 cos…”

Section: ) Reflected Componentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A valuable contribution to the development of so-called optical view factors is made by Appelbaum [7] [8]. These models have been further refined by other authors, such as Durković and Đurišić [9] and Chudinzow et al [10]. Along with the optical models, the electrical and thermal models have been concurrently developed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulating the Power Output of Large Bifacial Photovoltaic Plants

Ostojic

Zeljković

Mršić

2020

IJEEC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bifacial photovoltaic modules have gained increasing attention in the last decade due to their potential to achieve higher annual energy yield in comparison to conventional monofacial modules. Since the higher energy production is also accompanied by higher investment costs, it is necessary to conduct a careful techno-economic analysis in order to provide the investors an answer about their accurate cost efficiency. The achievable energy output of a bifacial photovoltaic power plant is influenced by many factors such as module geometry, row spacing, orientation of the modules and ground albedo. Since the methodology for prediction of the energy yield has not yet been standardized, the main target of this paper was to create one version of a comprehensive standalone energy calculator that would serve as a useful performance assessment tool for designers and investors. The developed software tool was tested on several characteristic scenarios and the obtained results were compared with the results provided by two freely available online calculators.

show abstract

“…Entre las principales desventajas de la energía solar, destaca la baja eficiencia de los paneles solares y la intermitencia de la generación de electricidad debido a los efectos estocásticos de la fuente. En este sentido, los paneles fotovoltaicos bifaciales pueden ser una opción para aumentar la eficiencia de los proyectos solares y, de esta manera, reducir el uso de áreas destinadas para la instalación de los paneles [4], [5]. Cabe destacar que los paneles bifaciales son capaces de recibir y aprovechar la irradiación solar por ambas caras del panel, aumentado su capacidad de generar energía eléctrica.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Evaluación de superficies reflectantes para paneles solares bifaciales mediante la metodología de superficie respuesta

Castaño-Serna

Rubio-Clemente²,

Chica³

2022

Ing.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contexto: Los paneles solares fotovoltaicos bifaciales pueden generar más energía que los monofaciales, ya que, en el primer caso, ambos lados del panel quedan a disposición para captar la irradiancia solar y transformarla en energía eléctrica. La potencia adicional que se puede generar en los paneles bifaciales depende, entre otros factores, de la naturaleza y el tipo de la superficie reflectiva, así como de la orientación del módulo fotovoltaico. Método: En este trabajo se evalúan diversas superficies reflectantes para determinar la configuración óptima de un panel bifacial. Para este propósito, y con base en la metodología de superficie de respuesta, las curvas características del panel fotovoltaico (corriente-voltaje) para diversas elevaciones con respecto a cuatro superficies reflectantes son trazadas experimentalmente. Resultados: Los resultados del estudio revelan que, al instalar un panel bifacial sobre superficies reflectantes de espejo a una elevación del 98,66 % del ancho del panel, se logra alcanzar un aumento del 6,6 % de la generación de energía eléctrica en comparación con los módulos fotovoltaicos monofaciales. Conclusiones: Con la metodología aplicada, se identificó que la superficie de espejo es la mejor de las cuatro superficies evaluadas para el aprovechamiento de la irradiación reflejada, seguida por el concreto, el agua y la tierra.

show abstract

Extended model for irradiation suitable for large bifacial PV power plants

Cited by 20 publications

References 23 publications

Analysis of Peak Power Capacity on Rooftop Solar PV 1.25 kWp at Sun Conditions 90 Degrees

Analysis of Peak Power Capacity on Rooftop Solar PV 1.25 kWp at Sun Conditions 90 Degrees

Simulating the Power Output of Large Bifacial Photovoltaic Plants

Evaluación de superficies reflectantes para paneles solares bifaciales mediante la metodología de superficie respuesta

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About