2018
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression analysis of limb element markers during mouse embryonic development

Abstract: Background: While data regarding expression of limb element and tissue markers during normal mouse limb development exist, few studies show expression patterns in upper and lower limbs throughout key limb development stages. A comparison to normal developmental events is essential when analyzing development of the limb in mutant mice models. Results: Expression patterns of the joint marker Gdf5, tendon and ligament marker Scleraxis, early muscle marker MyoD1, and blood vessel marker Cadherin5 (Cdh5) are presen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S8 a). In the distal side HCZ, some lacunae appeared empty, likely due to apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes 37 (Fig. 6 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S8 a). In the distal side HCZ, some lacunae appeared empty, likely due to apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes 37 (Fig. 6 b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since skeletal mineralisation starts as early as E15.5 37 , we fixed an E15.5 mouse femur and monitored mineralisation in unstained tissue of distal to proximal regions using ASEM. Although we previously demonstrated that ASEM can image mineralisation as bright signals 35 , we detected no mineralisation at this stage, potentially because of low mineralisation levels at E15.5 37 . When stained with PTA, round resting chondrocytes were imaged in the RCZ of the periarticular region (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The femur given the treatment of HgCl 2 on GD 9 had significantly lower growth in length of femur 0.52±0.17 than the control 0.64±0.09, or 18.7% decrease ( Table 5 and Fig 8 ), but had different growth in diameter (0.91±0.32) compared to controls (0.92±0.35; Table 6 and Fig 9 ). We suspect that the effects were different because the humerus (forelimb) develops earlier than the femur (hindlimb) [ 32 ], and it has also been known that growth in length develops much earlier than growth in diameter in the long bones [ 33 ]. Different stages of development lead to different sensitivity to external stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we aimed to detect the expression of the three examined epigenetic markers at the mRNA level in cryosections of 15-day-old whole mouse embryos by in situ hybridization. We have chosen the age of the embryo by considering the stages of cartilage development as described by Rafipay et al [49]. They established that cartilage and bone formation in the developing limbs of a mouse embryo took place between E12.5 and E16.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%