Exploring the role of civilizational competences for smart cities’ development

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to identify the main necessary competences for smart cities’ development. From their inception until now, smart cities are striving to clarify their identity and become better, and thus, smarter. The whole process is in many ways similar to the journey of a child in his quest of growing into a smart adult, with the help of parents and support from educators. But it is not easy to tell how we, as citizens, through civic, educational and governance structures, raise smart cities. What competences do we need? This was the main question for the present essay, generated from several theoretical and practical experiences. Design/methodology/approach In this study, literature analysis, synthesis and theoretical inferences, for the smart city problematiques, and induction and exploratory qualitative analysis, for soft, civilizational competences, were used. Findings The main conclusion is that the literature still associates the smart city especially with its hard dimension, the highly developed and intelligent technologies, including information and communication technologies (ICTs), despite a growing number of studies dedicated to the soft, human and social capital component. The intangible, soft component – the human actor – plays an equally, if not even more important role, through mechanisms affecting all classical dimensions of smart cities (smart economy, people, governance, mobility, environment, living). Civilizational competences, soft skills or human-related characteristics of cities strongly influenced by culture (at national, regional, organizational and individual levels) are crucial for the development of smart and competitive cities. Civilizational competences are grouped into four categories: enterprise culture, discoursive culture, civic culture and daily culture. If we want to make our cities smart, we need to develop these competences – first define them, then identify their antecedents or influence factors and measure them. Research limitations/implications The study has several limits. First, the exploratory nature in itself, with many inductive and abductive suppositions that will need further testing. Second, the literature selection has a certain degree of subjectivity owing to the fact that besides the common, classical theory of smart cities, the authors were particularly interested in rather heterodox opinions about the subject, which lead them to the inclusion of singular or isolated points of view on narrower issues. Practical implications The findings of this exploratory conceptual essay could be used for further testing of hypotheses on the relationship between civilizational competences and smart cities’ development. Social implications Local and regional administrations could use the results to increase civil society’s involvement in the development of smart cities. Originality/value The study points out some new connections and relations for the smart city problematiques, and explicitly suggests relating the development of smart cities to the development of civilizational competences, as a complex category of factors going beyond the unique dimension of “people” or “human and social capital” from the smart cities literature. It is an exploratory outcome, generating new research hypotheses for the relationships between smart city development and culture-related factors grouped under the “cities” civilizational competences’ label.

Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

“…Citizens' local embeddedness and place-and community-identity are significant for mobilizing resources to organize collaborative (online) activities in the public domain. In line with this, several studies demonstrated that in order to establish successful urban development, smart governance planning processes should fit the distinct community context (Castelnovo et al, 2015;Álvarez-Crespo, 2014;Zait, 2017). Table 2 summarizes the expectations we found for the influence of context on smart governance.…”

“…What information there was suggested that intrinsic motivation and intangible rewards were far more decisive factors in the decision to participate in collaborative technology-supported governance than extrinsic motives (e.g., monetary reward). Civil actors were found often to be motivated for reasons of solidarity, altruism, and the felt need for problem-solving in environmental and community issues Kim and Lee, 2012;Zait, 2017). However, the examined studies also confirm that despite civic voluntarism by knowledgeable and active inhabitants, citizens' interest and involvement in public affairs exhibit a general decline (Krenjova and Raudla, 2017; Sørensen and Torfing, 2016; Roman and Miller, 2013;Deakin and Allwinkle, 2007;Chiabai et al, 2013;Wehn et al, 2015).…”

Civic Engagement at the Crossroads of Online and Offline Spaces: A PLS-Sem Assessment

“…Therefore, the civil society can act as a catalyst, an accelerator, a guardian and a helmsman, at the same time (Zait, 2017), leading to synergistic effects between all economic and social aspects (Andrei et al, 2017a;Soto-Acosta et al, 2016). The social capital generated by civic participation produces economic growth (Temple, 2001), increases future participation (Reddick, 2011), and fosters the development of varied civic services (Dekker, 2009), leading to the rise of a new type of economy, which can be labeled as an "economy of engagement" (Huddart, 2008).…”

Espaço Público: Reconfigurações Físicas E Percepções De Usuários Em Perspectivas De Longo Prazo

“…As cidades são complexas amálgamas formadas por fenômenos que resultam de uma multiplicidade de interações dinâmicas entre infraestruturas, produção e consumo, e que podem ser analisadas a partir de suas dimensões morfológicas, demográficas, econômicas, socioculturais, e de gestão e planejamento (Nas, 2011). Quanto às funções macro, esses espaços urbanos têm procurado se redefinir, por exemplo, como cidades mundiais, cidades culturais, cidades compactas, cidades criativas (Okano e Samson, 2010), informacionais, inteligentes (Zait, 2017) e digitais estratégicas (Rezende e Procopiuck, 2018). Avançar em direção a cada uma dessas temáticas tem levado muitas cidades a adotarem a revitalização urbana como um tema central para a formulação de políticas urbanas, com impactos na vida dos cidadãos (Okano e Samson, 2010).…”