2005
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the perception of social characteristics in faces using the isolation effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
61
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was in fact also apparent in Table 1, where the "jaw height" feature (no. 21 in Table 1) was the among the "top 5" positive correlations with youthful-attractiveness (together with the four eye-related features we listed previously), and the other jawline features (22)(23)(24) were all in the "top 11. "…”
Section: Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result was in fact also apparent in Table 1, where the "jaw height" feature (no. 21 in Table 1) was the among the "top 5" positive correlations with youthful-attractiveness (together with the four eye-related features we listed previously), and the other jawline features (22)(23)(24) were all in the "top 11. "…”
Section: Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 provides an overview of the methods. To quantify first impressions, we used a database of 1,000 highly variable ambient face photographs of adults of overall Caucasian appearance, which had been previously rated for a variety of social traits by observers with a Western cultural background (21)(22)(23)(24). We focused on first impressions of Caucasian-looking faces by participants with a Western upbringing to avoid possible confounding influences of "other-race" effects (25,26).…”
Section: Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From ratings of the perceived trustworthiness of these 1,000 face photographs established in previous studies (Santos & Young, 2005;Santos & Young, 2008;Santos & Young, 2011;Sutherland, et al, 2013;Sutherland, et al, 2015) the 15 male faces with lowest rated trustworthiness and the 15 male faces with highest rated trustworthiness were selected, subject to constraints that the photographs included no spectacles, were sufficiently close to frontal view that both eyes were visible, showed no beards or moustaches, and that there were no more than two faces with hats in each set. These constraints were introduced only to allow the creation of relatively sharp averaged images.…”
Section: Face Perception and Social Cognition Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%