People with Huntington's disease and people suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder show severe deficits in recognizing facial expressions of disgust, whereas people with lesions restricted to the amygdala are especially impaired in recognizing facial expressions of fear. This double dissociation implies that recognition of certain basic emotions may be associated with distinct and non-overlapping neural substrates. Some authors, however, emphasize the general importance of the ventral parts of the frontal cortex in emotion recognition, regardless of the emotion being recognized. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to locate neural structures that are critical for recognition of facial expressions of basic emotions by investigating cerebral activation of six healthy adults performing a gender discrimination task on images of faces expressing disgust, fear and anger. Activation in response to these faces was compared with that for faces showing neutral expressions. Disgusted facial expressions activated the right putamen and the left insula cortex, whereas enhanced activity in the posterior part of the right gyrus cinguli and the medial temporal gyrus of the left hemisphere was observed during processing of angry faces. Fearful expressions activated the right fusiform gyrus and the left dorsolateral frontal cortex. For all three emotions investigated, we also found activation of the inferior part of the left frontal cortex (Brodmann area 47). These results support the hypotheses derived from neuropsychological findings, that (i) recognition of disgust, fear and anger is based on separate neural systems, and that (ii) the output of these systems converges on frontal regions for further information processing.

No abstract

No abstract

The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Background. Previous behavioural and neuroimaging studies of emotion processing in autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) have focused on the use of facial stimuli. To date, however, no studies have examined emotion processing in autism across a broad range of social signals.Method. This study addressed this issue by investigating emotion processing in a group of 23 adults with ASD and 23 age-and gender-matched controls. Recognition of basic emotions (' happiness ', ' sadness ', ' anger ', disgust' and ' fear ') was assessed from facial, body movement and vocal stimuli. The ability to make social judgements (such as approachability) from facial stimuli was also investigated.Results. Significant deficits in emotion recognition were found in the ASD group relative to the control group across all stimulus domains (faces, body movements and voices). These deficits were seen across a range of emotions. The ASD group were also impaired in making social judgements compared to the control group and this correlated with impairments in basic emotion recognition.Conclusions. This study demonstrates that there are significant and broad-ranging deficits in emotion processing in ASD present across a range of stimulus domains and in the auditory and visual modality ; they cannot therefore be accounted for simply in terms of impairments in face processing or in the visual modality alone. These results identify a core deficit affecting the processing of a wide range of emotional information in ASD, which contributes to the impairments in social function seen in people with this condition. IntroductionAutism, as defined by DSM-IV criteria, is a developmental disorder characterized by difficulties in social interaction, a restricted repetitive range of interests and behaviours and impairments in verbal and nonverbal communication. There is a broad clinical phenotype that encompasses a wide range of behaviour and degrees of global intellectual impairment. This results in a diverse clinical population, generally described as having an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Individuals on the autism spectrum who do not show global intellectual impairment are commonly referred to as having high-functioning autism (HFA) if they have a history of significant language delay and Asperger syndrome (AS) if they do not. For adults with HFA/AS it is the difficulties in social communication and interaction that are frequently the most debilitating.Studies have identified deficits in facial emotion recognition in both children (C...

Presence of S-100 in serum after ischemic stroke may be due to combined leakage out of necrotic glial cells and passage through an impaired brain-blood barrier, indicating severe ischemic cell injury. Therefore, S-100 in serum can be used as a peripheral marker of ischemic focal brain damage and may be helpful for therapeutic decisions in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND The amygdala plays a central role in detecting and responding to fear related stimuli. A number of recent studies have reported decreased amygdala activation in schizophrenia to emotional stimuli (such as fearful faces) compared to matched neutral stimuli (such as neutral faces). Here we have investigated whether the apparent decrease in amygdala activation in schizophrenia could actually derive from increased amygdala activation to the neutral comparator stimuli.METHODS Nineteen patients with schizophrenia and 24 matched control participants viewed pictures of faces with either fearful or neutral facial expressions, and a baseline condition, during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning.RESULTS Patients with schizophrenia showed a relative decrease in amygdala activation to fearful faces when compared to neutral faces. However this difference resulted from an increase in amygdala activation to the neutral faces in patients with schizophrenia, not from a decreased response to the fearful faces. 2. The relevance of the findings to symptoms that characterize the disorder would strengthen the paper (i.e., relate the findings to symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia in the context of theories in the literature on amygdala function). Otherwise, the findings seem overly data driven.Response: We have sought to relate the current data to two of the main theories of the pathogenesis of schizophrenia in the discussion (2, 3). The former of these theories (2) argues for inappropriate amygdala activation in schizophrenia, a view which is directly supported by our data. The second hypothesis (3) argues that individual with schizophrenia attribute increased affective salience to otherwise neutral events, providing the setting for the formation of symptoms such as delusional beliefs. We believe that the present finding of increased amygdala activation to neutral faces in schizophrenia provides a potential biological basis for such a liability to psychosis. We have attempted to re-word part of the discussion to make these links more explicit, although fuller coverage is precluded by the word limit. Fear of faces in schizophreniaHall et al looked at the response of the amygdala, a brain region mediating fear, to faces in control subjects and participants with schizophrenia. They found that control subjects show amygdala activation to fearful faces, but not neutral faces. However patients with schizophrenia activated the amygdala fear system to both neutral and fearful faces. These results suggest that people with schizophrenia may perceive neutral faces as fearful, potentially contributing to the development of psychotic symptoms. IN THIS ISSUE StatementHall J et al AbstractBackground The amygdala plays a central role in detecting and responding to fear

Facial appearance can motivate behaviour and elicit activation of brain circuits putatively involved in reward. Gender differences have been observed for motivation to view beauty in adult faces--heterosexual women are motivated by beauty in general, while heterosexual men are motivated to view opposite-sex beauty alone. Although gender differences have been observed in sensitivity to infant cuteness, infant faces appear to hold equal incentive salience among men and women. In the present study, we investigated the incentive salience of attractiveness and cuteness in adult and infant faces, respectively. We predicted that, given alternative viewing options, gender differences would emerge for motivation to view infant faces. Heterosexual participants completed a "pay-per-view" key-press task, which allowed them to control stimulus duration. Gender differences were found such that infants held greater incentive salience among women, although both sexes differentiated infant faces based on cuteness. Among adult faces, men exerted more effort than women to view opposite-sex faces. These findings suggest that, contrary to previous reports, gender differences do exist in the incentive salience of infant faces as well as opposite-sex faces.

No abstract