Handbook of Social Psychology 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceiving People

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 433 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, there is strong evidence that such visually marked categories are extracted more efficiently than is identity information (see Macrae & Quadflieg, 2010). For example, visual noise more strongly degrades identity recognition than category recognition, even for well-known exemplars (Cloutier et al, 2005).…”
Section: How Do Perceiver Motives and Experience Coact In Creating Anmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That said, there is strong evidence that such visually marked categories are extracted more efficiently than is identity information (see Macrae & Quadflieg, 2010). For example, visual noise more strongly degrades identity recognition than category recognition, even for well-known exemplars (Cloutier et al, 2005).…”
Section: How Do Perceiver Motives and Experience Coact In Creating Anmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Categorization-Individuation Model begins with the well-validated finding that person perception can occur with two different attentional foci*categorization or individuation (Brewer, 1988;Macrae & Quadflieg, 2010). Whereas categorization involves a focus on shared characteristics among a class of exemplars (i.e., category-diagnostic information), individuation involves an attentional focus on target characteristics unique to a particular exemplar (i.e., identity-diagnostic information).…”
Section: Categorization and Individuation In Person Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge for a people perception framework, as opposed to person perception models (see Macrae & Quadflieg, 2010 for a recent review), is to explain how diverse visual information involving different objects (i.e., people) is integrated into an impression of a single object (i.e., a group). Work in the vision sciences has demonstrated that in order to efficiently process vast amounts of lowlevel perceptual information, humans make use of processes in the brain and visual system that statistically track the surrounding environment (e.g., Fiser & Aslin, 2001;Maloney, 2002;Turk-Browne, Junge, & Scholl, 2005).…”
Section: Ensemble Coding: a Pre´cismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past several decades of person perception research have revealed a great deal about the processes, characteristics, and outcomes associated with seeing other individuals (see Macrae & Quadflieg, 2010 for a review). It is now clear, for example, that facial features are automatically encoded in terms of social categories (e.g., race, gender, age), mental states (e.g., emotions, intentions), and traits (e.g., warmth, dominance, trustworthiness, competence; Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007;Ito & Urland, 2003;Oosterhof & Todorov, 2008;Todorov, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social cognition researchers describe how perceptual cues, in particular distinctive visual cues (Brewer & Lui, 1989 ;Zebrowitz, 1996 ), cause us to categorize people and imbue them with the attributes that are described by our schema of that group (see Macrae & Quadfl ieg, 2010 ). The entire process can be slow and deliberate, but in general it is fast and automatic (Fiske & Neuberg, 1990 ).…”
Section: Automatic Schema Activationmentioning
confidence: 97%