2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the gut of Helicoverpa armigera for cellulose degrading bacteria and evaluation of a potential strain for lignocellulosic biomass deconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While for Klebsiella sp. MD21, by utilizing saw dust as substrate, the maximum activities for endoglucanase, exoglucanase and -1,4-xylanase were observed at 96 h of incubation [63]. Collectively, these indicated that the maximum activity of lignocellulose degrading enzymes could occur at different time point depends on different bacteria and/or lignocellulosic substrates.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While for Klebsiella sp. MD21, by utilizing saw dust as substrate, the maximum activities for endoglucanase, exoglucanase and -1,4-xylanase were observed at 96 h of incubation [63]. Collectively, these indicated that the maximum activity of lignocellulose degrading enzymes could occur at different time point depends on different bacteria and/or lignocellulosic substrates.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Enzyme catalysis was specific, and different foods require specific enzymes for digestion and absorption by insects, and might adapt to dietary changes through the induction of enzyme production [ 23 ]. Different dietary characteristics may ultimately correspond to different gut microbial compositions [ 61 , 62 ]. In this study, we considered the correlation between feeding habits and the gut bacterial community of Ensifera to explore the dietary characteristics of the sample with contrasting feeding habits from the perspective of gut bacterial community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genomic DNA was then extracted from the treated cells following the standard enzyme assisted cell disruption procedure followed by solvent extraction using PCI (Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl alcohol) in the ratio 25:24:1 and successive purification using ice-cold ethanol. The 16S rRNA gene was particularly amplified with the help of degenerative universal forward primer 27 F and reverse primer 1492R using hot-start PCR (Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler, Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Sin-gapore) [ 45 ]. The amplification of the gene was initiated primarily by denaturing the DNA at 95 °C for 5 min succeeded by 35 complete cycles of the denaturation, annealing, and elongation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%