2021
DOI: 10.1057/s41307-020-00217-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Conflict of Interest in University Accreditation in Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we denoted as the number of confirmed COVID‐19 cases at time t , let now be a collection of all past realizations of . Then, the Poisson model, used traditionally to analyze count data (see, e.g., Agosto and Giudici, 2020 ; Barroilhet et al., 2022 ; Biswas et al., 2020 ), has a probability function given by …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we denoted as the number of confirmed COVID‐19 cases at time t , let now be a collection of all past realizations of . Then, the Poisson model, used traditionally to analyze count data (see, e.g., Agosto and Giudici, 2020 ; Barroilhet et al., 2022 ; Biswas et al., 2020 ), has a probability function given by …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversies and scandals, including the exposure of corruption in certain cases, have led to perceptions of inconsistency in accreditation rulings as to the institutional development of some universities (Espinoza and González, 2012, 2013; Salazar and Leihy, 2014). Recently, the presence of bias in the voting practices of those appointed to make institutional accreditation determinations has been verified, uncovering a tendency of members to favour the types of institutions that nominated them for the role (Barroilhet et al , 2021). As such, the classificatory types of university can be seen to carry loyalties that perpetuate differential treatment as well as reflect different cultural values; nevertheless, the overall behaviour of the university groupings is evident in patterned achievement under external evaluation.…”
Section: Institutional Accreditation: the Classification Of Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both management and academic activities benefited from insights emerging from external evaluation into changing demands on human, physical and information resources (Lemaitre, 2005; Zapata and Tejeda, 2009; Scharager and Aravena, 2010; Espinoza and González, 2011; CINDA, 2011; Lemaitre et al , 2012; Cancino and Schmaal, 2014; López et al , 2015; Rojas and López, 2016; López et al , 2019a; Duque, 2021). Ongoing problems include sensitivity to institutional diversity, the objectivity of processes and determinations, alignment of results with legal and economic definitions and administrative compliance’s working against the development of cultures of quality (Espinoza and González, 2019; Barroilhet, 2019; Barroilhet et al , 2021). Regulatory adjustments have followed, reflecting vibrant debates over the organisation and deployment of standards, among other issues, leading eventually to the enactment and implementation of new laws.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we denoted {X t } as the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases at time t, let now X t−1 ≡ {X t−1 , X t−2 , ...} be a collection of all past realizations of X t . Then, the Poisson model, used traditionally to analyze count data (see Agosto and Giudici (2020); Barroilhet et al (2021); Biswas et al (2020) as examples) has a probability function given by:…”
Section: First Stage: New Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%