1998
DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0202_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of the Developmental Components Contributing to Elementary School Children's Reading Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In first grade, individual differences in reading comprehension are largely explained by differences in decoding skills. Such a finding is consistent with that of numerous studies that have reported a strong relation between word recognition and reading comprehension in the early grades (Hoover & Gough, 1990;Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986;Rupley et al, 1998;Shankweiler et al, 1995Shankweiler et al, , 1999Stanovich, Cunningham, & Feeman, 1984). Consequently, the contribution of linguistic-comprehension variables to the explanation of individual differences in reading comprehension is relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In first grade, individual differences in reading comprehension are largely explained by differences in decoding skills. Such a finding is consistent with that of numerous studies that have reported a strong relation between word recognition and reading comprehension in the early grades (Hoover & Gough, 1990;Juel, Griffith, & Gough, 1986;Rupley et al, 1998;Shankweiler et al, 1995Shankweiler et al, , 1999Stanovich, Cunningham, & Feeman, 1984). Consequently, the contribution of linguistic-comprehension variables to the explanation of individual differences in reading comprehension is relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consequently, the contribution of linguistic-comprehension variables to the explanation of individual differences in reading comprehension is relatively low. As word recognition becomes automated throughout grade levels, the direct predictive weight of linguistic-comprehension variables such as vocabulary and working memory capacity increases concomitant with the decrease in the association of decoding skills with reading comprehension (see also Rupley et al, 1998). In our study, the specific contribution of working memory capacity appears to emerge in third grade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it appears that individual differences in ORF were particularly important in accounting for children's growth in reading comprehension, relative to the other measures that were given. This explanation is consistent with developmental models of reading that highlight the importance of fluency to reading comprehension in middle-elementary youngsters (e.g., Chall, 1996;Rupley et al, 1998).…”
Section: Answering the Study Questionssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Jenkins and Jewell (1993) suggest that the strong relationship between ORF and reading comprehension in young elementary children may relate primarily to the fact that both measures are highly sensitive to individual differences in word identification at beginning stages of reading development. At more proficient stages of reading, most children have highly accurate, automatic word identification, so reading comprehension begins to depend relatively more heavily on language comprehension (Hoover & Gough, 1990;Rupley, Willson, & Nichols, 1998), reducing the strength of the relationship between ORF and reading comprehension. Consistent with this line of reasoning, Saiegh-Haddad (2003) found that ORF and reading comprehension did not correlate significantly in a group of Hebrew-and Arabic-speaking adults reading adult-level text in their native languages; however, for both groups, correlations were significant when participants were reading a second language, English.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%