IEEE 36th Conference on Power Electronics Specialists, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/pesc.2005.1581751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Deadbeat Control for DC-DC Converters as Hybrid Systems

Abstract: The concept of large signal controllability for switched electrical networks is reviewed for dc-dc converters. Small signal models and controllers are limited by assumptions of fixed operating point. Hybrid system representations allow use of geometric control methods including sliding mode and boundary based switching controls.The comparison of geometric control response with small signal response shows a fundamental difference: only geometric methods are capable of deadbeat (finite time duration) recovery to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42. Phase plane plots corresponding to load transient response using switching boundary control methods with second-order switching surface [155], deadbeat control [162], [163] and PWM control with large-signal tuning [168] using the parameter set in Table I In practice, the step size does not need to be known instantly, since the on-state trajectory continues until the intersection point with σ; there is a time interval between the disturbance and the intersection point that can be used for computation.…”
Section: Geometric Tuning Methods For Dc-dc Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42. Phase plane plots corresponding to load transient response using switching boundary control methods with second-order switching surface [155], deadbeat control [162], [163] and PWM control with large-signal tuning [168] using the parameter set in Table I In practice, the step size does not need to be known instantly, since the on-state trajectory continues until the intersection point with σ; there is a time interval between the disturbance and the intersection point that can be used for computation.…”
Section: Geometric Tuning Methods For Dc-dc Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inductor energy slews as quickly as possible to return to the reference voltage in the shortest time. This is a deadbeat control [162], meaning that there is complete transient recovery in finite time. Timing constraints can be added to enforce fixed frequency even through a transient [163].…”
Section: B Time Optimal Control In Dc-dc Convertersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-domain modeling of a DC-DC converter power stage in VERILOG and VHDL, allow the digital designers to simulate and debug different algorithms in their controller design in the form of a complete closed-loop feedback. Examples include but not limited to: non-linear control technique [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], dead-time optimization [31,32], current sharing [17], phase adding/shedding [19], voltage/current measurements, under/over voltage and current protection [33], etc.…”
Section: Dc-dc Converter Time-domain Simulation In Verilog and Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of the system in each mode is also well defined by the state equations. So the system will operate in a stable limit cycle [15].…”
Section: Different Approaches In Mode Switched Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%