2001
DOI: 10.1080/02680510120050334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting Online Interactivity to Enhance Assignment Development and Feedback in Distance Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most students agreed or totally agreed that this kind of feedback was basically aimed at providing the correct answer (83.1%) or providing information on errors (69.4%), rather than at improving their work (51.8%), or how to take learning deeper (47.9%). In this kind of feedback-known as a 'model answer' in online teaching and learning environments (see, among others, Collis et al 2001 andMacdonald 2001)-the teacher simply provides the correct answer for students to make their own comparative evaluation. In other words, the teacher gives students the responsibility for taking advantage of feedback within the learning process using their own initiative.…”
Section: The Presence Of Feedback In Online Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most students agreed or totally agreed that this kind of feedback was basically aimed at providing the correct answer (83.1%) or providing information on errors (69.4%), rather than at improving their work (51.8%), or how to take learning deeper (47.9%). In this kind of feedback-known as a 'model answer' in online teaching and learning environments (see, among others, Collis et al 2001 andMacdonald 2001)-the teacher simply provides the correct answer for students to make their own comparative evaluation. In other words, the teacher gives students the responsibility for taking advantage of feedback within the learning process using their own initiative.…”
Section: The Presence Of Feedback In Online Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one articles reasoned from social constructivism: Licklider (1995), Black and Wiliam (1998), Tillema and Smith (2000), MacDonald (2001), Manouchehri (2002), Mory (2003), Schelfhout, Dochy, and Janssens (2004), Gibbs and Simpson (2004), Yang and Liu (2004), Weaver (2006), Hattie and Timperley (2007), Brandt (2008), Segers, Gijbels, and Thurlings (2008), Landry, Anthony, Swank, andMonseque-Bailey (2009), Fund (2010), Gielen, Peeters, Dochy, Onghena, and Struyven (2010), Kretlow and Bartholomew (2010), Li, Liu, and Steckelberg (2010), Martens, de Brabander, Rozendaal, Boekaerts, and Van der Leeden (2010), Colasante (2011), and Van der Kleij, Eggen, Timmers, and Veldkamp (2012).…”
Section: Data-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five reviewed articles examined students' perceptions of the learning environment and feedback (Brandt, 2008;MacDonald, 2001;Segers et al, 2008;Tillema & Smith, 2000;Weaver, 2006). Two of them found significant results.…”
Section: Social Constructivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, positive student learning experiences are more likely to occur when a lecturer is evidently present in an online course to secure student "buy-in" as stated in Pallof & Pratt (1999, p. 4). Applying a different approach to achieve the same outcome, Nagel and Kotze (2010) Feedback has long been acknowledged as singularly motivational, particularly for students studying at a distance or online (Curtis & Lawson, 2001;Macdonald, 2001;Johnson & Aragon, 2003;Moore & Kearsley, 2011).…”
Section: 60%mentioning
confidence: 99%