2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
0
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(252 reference statements)
3
114
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The fourth dimension is positive vs. neutral vs. negative and concerns whether feedback is expressed in a positive way (e.g., providing compliments), in a negative way (e.g., conveying slate or attacking the receivers), or in a neutral way (i.e., neither positive nor negative; e.g., Scheeler et al, 2004). Based on our literature review, we assumed that goal-directed, specific, and detailed feedback that is formulated in a neutral manner is more effective for learning than feedback that is person-directed, general, vague, and formulated either too positive or too negative (Thurlings et al, 2013;Thurlings, Vermeulen, Kreijns et al, 2012). These four dimensions are central in the observation instrument we used.…”
Section: How We Defined Effective Observed Feedback In Our Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fourth dimension is positive vs. neutral vs. negative and concerns whether feedback is expressed in a positive way (e.g., providing compliments), in a negative way (e.g., conveying slate or attacking the receivers), or in a neutral way (i.e., neither positive nor negative; e.g., Scheeler et al, 2004). Based on our literature review, we assumed that goal-directed, specific, and detailed feedback that is formulated in a neutral manner is more effective for learning than feedback that is person-directed, general, vague, and formulated either too positive or too negative (Thurlings et al, 2013;Thurlings, Vermeulen, Kreijns et al, 2012). These four dimensions are central in the observation instrument we used.…”
Section: How We Defined Effective Observed Feedback In Our Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many studies on feedback to teachers examine teachers' perceptions of feedback or manipulated feedback characteristics to reveal their effectiveness. To further study feedback processes, we recommended applying observational techniques (Thurlings et al, 2013). In this section, we elaborate on the rationale for how we defined and described effective observed feedback.…”
Section: How We Defined Effective Observed Feedback In Our Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Object of previous studies on student modeling such as understanding the learner behavior [21], determines the environmental effectiveness of the education system [22] or measuring the success of instructional efforts evaluation of the structure of the learning content [23], effectiveness in the learning process and predict the performance of the students [24], review of adaptive feedback for teachers [25], and analyzing of possible interactions with students using machine learning techniques, the result is the extraction of interesting patterns of student behavior and used to assist teachers in assessing learning [2]. Research on modeling student not only see from cognitive aspects but has grown more complex [21] [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements are the physical actions and processes that a student performs in the learning cycle. This cycle can be related to some models of educational feedback [1][2][3][4][5][6] where the two-feedback-loop model presented by Narciss 6 is an example that shows how instruction, tasks, feedback, and new instruction are interconnected in a cycle. But, the relation to feedback models is not the focus of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%