2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-013-1598-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on transitional shock wave--boundary layer interactions at Mach 5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However for lower contraction ratios a shrunk separation region has been obtained. There are many more research papers (Murugan et al 2015;Erdem et al 2013) that dealing with intake design available in the open literature. In all such studies boundary layer separation resulting from the interaction of cowl lip shock with the boundary layer over the ramp surface/isolator wall has been observed to be a key phenomenon that seize the performance of the intake section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However for lower contraction ratios a shrunk separation region has been obtained. There are many more research papers (Murugan et al 2015;Erdem et al 2013) that dealing with intake design available in the open literature. In all such studies boundary layer separation resulting from the interaction of cowl lip shock with the boundary layer over the ramp surface/isolator wall has been observed to be a key phenomenon that seize the performance of the intake section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent work of Erdem et al (2013), PIV measurements were performed (among other techniques) on laminar and transitional SWBLI at Mach 5. The impinging shock wave (7° flow deflection angle) separates the incoming boundary layer, and transition is recorded near the end of the separation bubble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is noticed that two different definitions of the characteristic time scale of the flow field are used in experiments of CTBL, either τ f = δ/U ∞ (Ganapathisubramani et al 2006;Lapsa & Dahm 2011;Brooks et al 2018;Peltier et al 2018) or τ f = 10δ/U ∞ (Erdem et al 2013;Neeb, Saile & Gülhan 2018;Williams et al 2018), respectively. Here δ is the boundary layer thickness at the position of interest, and U ∞ is the free-stream velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%