44th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-3333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution PIV measurements of a transitional shock wave-boundary layer interaction

Abstract: downstream of the shock. Under the same shock conditions, the transitional interaction displays a smaller separation bubble (43δ * i,0 ), and transition is found to be accelerated over the separation bubble.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted that the bubble size is approximately halved when increasing the amplitude of the inflow perturbations by a factor of 32 (u inflow /U ∞ = 0.0026 % to 0.082 %). In a recent study by the authors (Giepman, Schrijer & Van Oudheusden 2015) high-resolution particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed on transitional oblique shock wave reflections for a Mach number of 1.7, unit Reynolds number of 35 × 10 6 m −1 and a flow deflection angle of θ = 3 • (p 3 /p 1 = 1.35). A full-span flat-plate model was used to generate a laminar boundary layer, while a partial-span shock generator was used to position the oblique shock wave in either the laminar, transitional or turbulent part of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noted that the bubble size is approximately halved when increasing the amplitude of the inflow perturbations by a factor of 32 (u inflow /U ∞ = 0.0026 % to 0.082 %). In a recent study by the authors (Giepman, Schrijer & Van Oudheusden 2015) high-resolution particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed on transitional oblique shock wave reflections for a Mach number of 1.7, unit Reynolds number of 35 × 10 6 m −1 and a flow deflection angle of θ = 3 • (p 3 /p 1 = 1.35). A full-span flat-plate model was used to generate a laminar boundary layer, while a partial-span shock generator was used to position the oblique shock wave in either the laminar, transitional or turbulent part of the boundary layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially developed for low-speed flows, the techniques are now being applied to high-speed SWBLI. Examples of the emerging capabilities of experiments are seen in recent studies of SWBLI by Souverein et al (2010) for turbulent interactions and Giepman et al (2015) for initially laminar interactions. On the numerical side progress has been even more striking, mainly enabled by improvements in computer hardware, but also with careful attention to algorithms, so this is briefly reviewed first, before proceeding to the physical problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the transitional case, a marginal separation occurs. As part of the TFAST project, Giepman et al [4] reported a similar situation for different SWBLIs at M = 1.7. While the separated region is large for the laminar interaction, for the transitional case the zone of reversed flow is significantly reduced and no meanflow separation is present for the turbulent interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%