2018
DOI: 10.29252/jafm.11.01.28164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations of Cowl Lip for the Improvement of Supersonic-Intake Performance

Abstract: This paper discusses the performance enhancement of supersonic air intake model through the implementation of blunted leading edge to the cowl lip section of the model. A supersonic air intake model with sharp cowl leading edge is initially considered to numerically investigate its performance. Mach 3, supersonic intake flow through the base model has been simulated using commercial CFD package Ansys Fluent-15. Comparison of numerical predictions and experimental measurements is presented to demonstrate the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5 the wall pressure distribution normalized with respect to the far field total pressure is reported. The plot shows a comparison between the experimental results from [58], the present numerical results and the numerical results obtained with the SST k − ω [30] and k − [31] models by [59]. All the numerical simulations tend to underestimate the pressure on the second ramp but they are very close to each other.…”
Section: Validation At M ∞ =supporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 5 the wall pressure distribution normalized with respect to the far field total pressure is reported. The plot shows a comparison between the experimental results from [58], the present numerical results and the numerical results obtained with the SST k − ω [30] and k − [31] models by [59]. All the numerical simulations tend to underestimate the pressure on the second ramp but they are very close to each other.…”
Section: Validation At M ∞ =supporting
confidence: 57%
“…grid, present work SA, medium grid, present work SA, fine grid, present work k-[59] k-[59] Exp [58]. Comparison of the wall pressure distribution at M ∞ = 3 with experimental and numerical results from literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects can significantly impact the overall intake performance, and flow behavior can vary depending on the intake's characteristics. Several studies have explored design optimization [45][46][47], while others have investigated how various intake configurations perform at off-design conditions or how different flow control methods can be used to prevent flow unsteadiness. These studies share a common goal: to widen the operational range and increase the efficiency of high-speed intakes.…”
Section: Physics and Characterization Of Intake Buzzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a small cowl deflection, the shock can be weakened, and the flow separation suppressed, possibly improving intake performance [52]. The design optimization of the cowl lip is more commonly investigated in steady flows, and any alterations can notably influence cowl drag, mass-capture, heat loads, and total pressure recovery [9,46,47,[53][54][55][56]. While Fisher [33] discussed various oscillation amplitudes with varying cowl lip positions during intake buzz, Shi et al [57] described the buzz evolution process influenced by the translation of the cowl.…”
Section: Physics and Characterization Of Intake Buzzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inlets must operate in the started mode for proper function. The inlets in an unstarted mode typically capture less air flow and have low air compression efficiency (Wagner et al 2012a;Li et al 2013;John and Senthilkumar 2018), which could be dangerous for the scramjet or even the whole vehicle (Voland et al 2013;Shimura et al 1998;Tan et al 2009;Poggie et al 2015). Inlet unstart issue has attracted much attention by researchers over recent decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%