2005
DOI: 10.1080/01442870500041744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimenting With a ‘Whole of Government’ Approach:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ironically, positioning Indigenous knowledge as innovative has the effect of dovetailing mātauranga into a neo-liberal discourse that sees science as a primarily economic mechanism to support innovation, enterprise and exporting (Peters 2000;McCormack 2011). Framing Māori people, resources and knowledge as a source of opportunity fits a progressive market view (Bargh and Otter 2009), aligned to another policy approachthe capability approach (Humpage 2005)that positions Māori as having 'the capability, initiative and aspiration to make choices for themselves' (Barcham 2012). From one perspective, the alignment of Māori development, self-determination and choice, can be seen as fitting not only the neo-liberal agenda, but also as a 'dangerous conversion of neo-colonialism and indigenous knowledge' (Smith et al 2016, p. 141).…”
Section: The Vision Mātauranga Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ironically, positioning Indigenous knowledge as innovative has the effect of dovetailing mātauranga into a neo-liberal discourse that sees science as a primarily economic mechanism to support innovation, enterprise and exporting (Peters 2000;McCormack 2011). Framing Māori people, resources and knowledge as a source of opportunity fits a progressive market view (Bargh and Otter 2009), aligned to another policy approachthe capability approach (Humpage 2005)that positions Māori as having 'the capability, initiative and aspiration to make choices for themselves' (Barcham 2012). From one perspective, the alignment of Māori development, self-determination and choice, can be seen as fitting not only the neo-liberal agenda, but also as a 'dangerous conversion of neo-colonialism and indigenous knowledge' (Smith et al 2016, p. 141).…”
Section: The Vision Mātauranga Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discursively, capacity development then emerged in the development lexicon out of a recognition that previous approaches to development were not producing desired results and therefore capacity development provided a conceptual framework for effective models of doing and describing development work. The antecedents of capacity development include institution building (Kühl, 2009), institutional development, human resource development (Lusthaus, Adrien, & Perstinger, 1999;Kühl, 2009), new institutionalism (Lusthaus, Adrien, & Perstinger, 1999;Kühl, 2009); and capacity building (Lusthaus, Adrien, & Perstinger, 1999;Black, 2003;Humpage, 2005;Hunt, 2005;Verity, 2007;Eade, 2007;Venner, 2014).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Capacity Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo anterior ha llevado a la aparición de nuevas ideas unidas a este paradigma. A modo de ejemplo, los términos whole-of-government o joined up governance han incidido en los problemas derivados de la excesiva fragmentación del sector público y la necesidad de revertirlos con estrategias centradas en una perspectiva holística de la acción gubernamental (Christensen y Laegreid, 2007;Humpage, 2005;Ling, 2002;Pollit, 2003). En todo caso, la NGP sigue estando presente en la caja de herramientas que disponen los directivos públicos en su quehacer diario, así como siendo punto de referencia en los estudios sobre gestión pública contemporáneos.…”
Section: Un Nuevo Paradigma En La Gestión Públicaunclassified