2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The buildability was evaluated in the context of the mixtures printed as shown in Figure . Shape retention was quantified using a shape retention factor (SRF) defined in Refs (which is also related to yield stress), and it was found that the printable mixtures used in this study showed SRF >0.80, which can be classified as structurally stable.…”
Section: Printer Paste Extrusion and Binder Selection For Extrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buildability was evaluated in the context of the mixtures printed as shown in Figure . Shape retention was quantified using a shape retention factor (SRF) defined in Refs (which is also related to yield stress), and it was found that the printable mixtures used in this study showed SRF >0.80, which can be classified as structurally stable.…”
Section: Printer Paste Extrusion and Binder Selection For Extrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biranchi et al proposed a framework of experiment to evaluate mix proportion variation depending on extrudability, shape retention, buildability and thixotropic open time (TOT). Those properties of material are critical at early-age in order to characterize the 3D printable geopolymer [37].…”
Section: State Of the Art And Research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the cost of formwork is reduced, because C3DP technology does not need to use formwork [6,7]. The C3DP also improved the buildability, functional integrity, and accuracy of construction [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In particular, the cost of formwork is reduced, because C3DP technology does not need to use formwork [6,7]. The C3DP also improved the buildability, functional integrity, and accuracy of construction [6,7]. Bos et al [8] and Hager et al [9] believed that C3DP could reduce the cost of construction techniques to a great extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%