1976
DOI: 10.1128/iai.13.1.92-99.1976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental neonatal colibacillosis in cows: serological studies

Abstract: Serological studies of passive immunity in experimentally induced bovine colibacillosis was studied in a 41-cow university herd. Pregnant dams were antigenized prepartum with two injections administered by the subcutaneous and intrammamary routes with one of four vaccine preparations (killed bacteria, live bacteria, culture supernatant, or heart infusion broth [control]). The data indicate that 77% of the neonates born to vaccinated dams were strongly protected against oral challenge with Escherichia coli stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In domestic species Haelterman (1965) showed that immune milk protected sucking pigs from TGE infection, while Wilson and Jutila (1975) Although in many cases the protection ascribed to milk has been shown to be immune in nature, care must be taken not to attribute all the protective effects of suckling to the immune system. It has been shown, for example, that a major advantage of breast feeding of infants when compared to formula feeding lies in the low buffering capacity of breast milk compared with cow's milk, which lowers the pH of the upper small intestine and so inhibits the multiplication of coliforms (Bullen & Willis, 1971), and milk contains many bacteriostatic agents, such as Iysozyme lactoferrins and lactoperoxidase (reviewed by Reiter, 1978) which may also be important in protection.…”
Section: Protectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In domestic species Haelterman (1965) showed that immune milk protected sucking pigs from TGE infection, while Wilson and Jutila (1975) Although in many cases the protection ascribed to milk has been shown to be immune in nature, care must be taken not to attribute all the protective effects of suckling to the immune system. It has been shown, for example, that a major advantage of breast feeding of infants when compared to formula feeding lies in the low buffering capacity of breast milk compared with cow's milk, which lowers the pH of the upper small intestine and so inhibits the multiplication of coliforms (Bullen & Willis, 1971), and milk contains many bacteriostatic agents, such as Iysozyme lactoferrins and lactoperoxidase (reviewed by Reiter, 1978) which may also be important in protection.…”
Section: Protectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous report we have shown that various Escherichia coli vaccines induced the formation of antibodies in preparturient bovine which protected calves against experimental neonatal colibacillosis (scours) (15,21). These data strongly suggested that protection against scours was afforded by both anti-O and anti-K antibodies acquired by the calf through the colostrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%