2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental measurement and analytical determination of shot peening residual stresses considering friction and real unloading behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…E p /E L is satisfied for each simulation at the various shot velocities in Table 5, except for velocities 75 m/s and 100 m/s, where the deviations from the lower limit are within acceptable value of 5 percent reported and referenced by Sherafatnia et al [38], and it has been highlighted in previous sections of this paper that 80 percent to 90 percent of energy lost by the shot is used for plastic deformation. Figure 5 is generated from these tables, with an indication of a reduction in the kinematic CoR as the impact velocity increases.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E p /E L is satisfied for each simulation at the various shot velocities in Table 5, except for velocities 75 m/s and 100 m/s, where the deviations from the lower limit are within acceptable value of 5 percent reported and referenced by Sherafatnia et al [38], and it has been highlighted in previous sections of this paper that 80 percent to 90 percent of energy lost by the shot is used for plastic deformation. Figure 5 is generated from these tables, with an indication of a reduction in the kinematic CoR as the impact velocity increases.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The use of 0.8 in Equation 7is justified considering the fractional kinetic energy loss λ = 1 − k, where k is the efficiency coefficient related to the elastic and thermal dissipation in a purely elastic impact. This efficiency coefficient is from the findings of J. Reed, which were reported and referenced by Sherafatnia et al [38]. Reed stated that k is given a constant value of 0.8 in most works reported in the literature, and also observed that a portion of the energy induced into the workpiece by the shot in purely elastic impact is dissipated as radiation of elastic waves and cannot be recovered.…”
Section: Cor Calculations For Single-shot Impact In Demmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Han et al 81 and Meguid et al 32 initially doubted the suitability of Coulomb's friction and subsequently proposed a modification to it which was done by Han et al 81 by taking relative movement in the contact area prior to slip into consideration. This kind of slip was also considered by Sherafatnia et al 82 when evaluating the effects of friction on residual stresses; and moreover, the mechanism of sliding was described in detail in this investigation. It was found that the effect of friction was dominant on the distribution of residual stresses in surface layers, and that the surface residual stresses decreased, while the maximum residual stresses increased partially as the coefficient of Coulomb's friction increased.…”
Section: Target Materialssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Numerous analytical models and numerical approaches based on finite element analysis have been developed to simulate the shot peening process and determine the relationships between process parameters, geometrical and material behavior characteristics of the target and the resulting residual stress field. Reviews of the wide variety of numerical models developed since the first simulation proposed by Edberg et al (1995) can be found in Rouhaud et al (2005) and Sherafatnia et al (2016). Analytical models allow determining the stress distribution and the depth of the affected zone but finite element simulations provide a better understanding of the process enabling parametric studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%