ASME 2019 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference 2019
DOI: 10.1115/icef2019-7216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Investigations of Marine Diesel Engine Performance Against Dynamic Back Pressure at Varying Sea-States due to Underwater Exhaust Systems

Abstract: Underwater exhaust systems are employed on board ships to allow zero direct emissions to the atmosphere with the possibility of drag reduction via exhaust gas lubrication. However, underwater expulsion of exhaust gases imparts high and dynamic back pressure, which can fluctuate in amplitude and time period as a ship operates in varying sea-states depending on its geographical location and weather conditions. Therefore, this research aims to experimentally investigate the performance of a marine diesel engine a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that NO x , HC, and CO emissions were reduced, but there was an increase in BSFC and exhaust smoke. Sapra et al 9 investigated the effects of dynamic EBP on the performance of a marine diesel engine operating with underwater exhaust systems in varying sea states. The study found that the adverse effects of dynamic EBP on engine performance were less severe than those found against static EBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found that NO x , HC, and CO emissions were reduced, but there was an increase in BSFC and exhaust smoke. Sapra et al 9 investigated the effects of dynamic EBP on the performance of a marine diesel engine operating with underwater exhaust systems in varying sea states. The study found that the adverse effects of dynamic EBP on engine performance were less severe than those found against static EBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%