2000
DOI: 10.1109/55.852962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence for quantum mechanical narrow channel effect in ultra-narrow MOSFET's

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold voltage for each case was extracted from the simulation data using the derivative of g m /I D method [12], minimizing the effect of gate-voltage dependent mobility and series-resistance. Quantum confinement was found to upshift the threshold voltage by 45 mV, a similar trend to the inversion-mode devices due to the higher quantized subband energies [13,14], and degrade the drain current, as shown in Fig. 8, from 8% in strong accumulation (V GS = 1.300 V) to 90% in the subthreshold region (V GS = 0.200 V).…”
Section: Tcad Sentaurus Device Simulation Of Gaa Deeply Scaled Si Nansupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The threshold voltage for each case was extracted from the simulation data using the derivative of g m /I D method [12], minimizing the effect of gate-voltage dependent mobility and series-resistance. Quantum confinement was found to upshift the threshold voltage by 45 mV, a similar trend to the inversion-mode devices due to the higher quantized subband energies [13,14], and degrade the drain current, as shown in Fig. 8, from 8% in strong accumulation (V GS = 1.300 V) to 90% in the subthreshold region (V GS = 0.200 V).…”
Section: Tcad Sentaurus Device Simulation Of Gaa Deeply Scaled Si Nansupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This can also be deduced from the scatter of the experimental data from Ref. [97]. The simulation results of the transfer characteristics with a single impurity present in different regions in the channel of the device, shown in the left panel of Fig.…”
Section: Threshold Voltage Fluctuations Due To Unintentional Doping Imentioning
confidence: 80%
“…On top of the SOI layer sits gate-oxide layer, the thickness of which is 34 nm. This is rather thick gate oxide, but it is used to compare the simulation results with the experimental data of Majima et al [97]. The doping of the source/drain junctions equals 10 19 cm -3 (if not stated otherwise), and the gate is assumed to be a metal gate with workfunction equal to the semiconductor affinity.…”
Section: Threshold Voltage Fluctuations Due To Unintentional Doping Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 shows the second derivative of the total electron density per unit length (d 2 N t /dV 2 GS ) versus V GS for the GAA 15 nm wide Si NW MOSFETs for three channel doping concentrations, considering classical and quantum effects. The results reported in Table I show that the quantization is upshifting both the threshold and the flat-band voltages, due to the higher quantized subband energies [9], [23], [24]. Note that, even for the heavily doped structure and on the contrary to the IM devices [19], there is no hump effect below the gate voltage corresponding to the main peak in the d 2 N t /dV 2 GS versus V GS curve, thus representing a unique threshold voltage in the system.…”
Section: Gate-channel Capacitance and Effective Channel Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%