1978
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<1788:eeogbm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Evaluation of Ground-Based Microwave Radiometric Sensing of Atmospheric Temperature and Water Vapor Profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LWC profiling method in this study combines LWP statistical inversion retrievals (e.g., Westwater and Guiraud 1980) with a vertical cloud model (e.g., Karstens et al 1994;Löhnert and Crewell 2003) as LWC = LWC ad [1.239 − 0.145ln(h)], where LWC ad is the adiabatic LWC (Lewis 1951;Mizuno 2000) and h is the height (m) from the cloud base, which is obtained from the infrared TB and temperature profile of the first guess. Another method to obtain the LWC profile, the neural network method, combines liquid profile climatology from historical radiosondes (Decker et al 1978) with microwave and infrared observations ). The neural network method has demonstrated a LWC profile retrieval accuracy of 50% or better when compared to balloon-borne supercooled liquid sensors (Ware et al 2003;Serke et al 2013) and radar (Campos et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LWC profiling method in this study combines LWP statistical inversion retrievals (e.g., Westwater and Guiraud 1980) with a vertical cloud model (e.g., Karstens et al 1994;Löhnert and Crewell 2003) as LWC = LWC ad [1.239 − 0.145ln(h)], where LWC ad is the adiabatic LWC (Lewis 1951;Mizuno 2000) and h is the height (m) from the cloud base, which is obtained from the infrared TB and temperature profile of the first guess. Another method to obtain the LWC profile, the neural network method, combines liquid profile climatology from historical radiosondes (Decker et al 1978) with microwave and infrared observations ). The neural network method has demonstrated a LWC profile retrieval accuracy of 50% or better when compared to balloon-borne supercooled liquid sensors (Ware et al 2003;Serke et al 2013) and radar (Campos et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NN is trained by using a series of historical radiosonde data at Tateno, including modeled liquid profile (Decker et al 1978;Ware et al 2013). The vertical resolutions of NN-derived profiles are 50 m from the surface to 500 m, 100 m to 2 km, and 250 m to 10 km.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stähli et al, 2013;Löhnert and Maier, 2012;Sánchez et al, 2013;Navas-Guzmán et al, 2016). Nevertheless, the specific effect of cloud liquid water on microwave temperature measurements has only been assessed in few studies (Decker et al, 1978;Cimini et al, 2011;Chan and Lee, 2015). Decker et al (1978) attempted a correction of temperature retrievals from a basic three-channel microwave radiometer by considering the absorption of cloud liquid water based on radiosonde measurements.…”
Section: Bernet Et Al: Cloud Effect On Temperature Retrievals Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the specific effect of cloud liquid water on microwave temperature measurements has only been assessed in few studies (Decker et al, 1978;Cimini et al, 2011;Chan and Lee, 2015). Decker et al (1978) attempted a correction of temperature retrievals from a basic three-channel microwave radiometer by considering the absorption of cloud liquid water based on radiosonde measurements. They stated that the correction for clouds can effectively reduce the error of temperature measurements.…”
Section: Bernet Et Al: Cloud Effect On Temperature Retrievals Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, absorption caused by water droplets in clouds can be considered independent of their droplet size distribution and can be linearly related to cloud liquid water density. The estimation of this parameter, as well as the detection of cloud layers, can be performed through a variety of cloud detection algorithms detailed in the literature [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%