2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and analytical investigation of the inelastic behavior of structures isolated using friction pendulum bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17, the minor increase of the coefficient of the interface in this case led to a smaller sliding displacement for the specimen with more mass in one direction (between t = 10.5 s and t = 11.5 s), which triggered a higher sliding displacement of the specimen with more mass in the other direction. This high sliding displacement of structures subjected to long-period pulses has been experimentally demonstrated by Tsiavos et al (2013Tsiavos et al ( , 2017Tsiavos et al ( , 2021bTsiavos et al ( , 2021c and analytically by Güneş (2022). The insignificant residual sliding displacement of 5 mm in this case demonstrates the efficiency of the lowcost and sustainable energy dissipation device to recenter the structure back to its original position after the end of the excitation for this increased value of the top mass.…”
Section: Influence Of Added Mass On the Responsesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…17, the minor increase of the coefficient of the interface in this case led to a smaller sliding displacement for the specimen with more mass in one direction (between t = 10.5 s and t = 11.5 s), which triggered a higher sliding displacement of the specimen with more mass in the other direction. This high sliding displacement of structures subjected to long-period pulses has been experimentally demonstrated by Tsiavos et al (2013Tsiavos et al ( , 2017Tsiavos et al ( , 2021bTsiavos et al ( , 2021c and analytically by Güneş (2022). The insignificant residual sliding displacement of 5 mm in this case demonstrates the efficiency of the lowcost and sustainable energy dissipation device to recenter the structure back to its original position after the end of the excitation for this increased value of the top mass.…”
Section: Influence Of Added Mass On the Responsesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…12. As presented in the figure, the dynamic instabilities manifested by increased values of drift for small intensity increments are observed for more ground motions when the seismic code compliance decreases, as observed by Tsiavos et al (2017Tsiavos et al ( , 2020. These instabilities indicate more extensive structural collapse (Vamvatsikos and Cornell 2002;D'Ayala et al 2015) for decreased seismic code compliance and can be more clearly illustrated in the fragility curves shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ida Curves Of the Four Building Models Of Varying Compliancementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Seismic base isolation, also known as base isolation [27][28][29][30], is a popular technique for protecting structures against earthquakes. It can substantially decouple the superstructure from its substructure, thus protecting the building from life loss or damage to non-structural components.…”
Section: Retrofit Solution S3: Seismic Base Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%