1969
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9975(69)90038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental anaphylaxis in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
11
3

Year Published

1972
1972
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
11
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation contradicts previous reported findings (Aitken & Sanford, 1969a). However, it should be emphasized that in the work of Aitken & Sanford, a different sensitization procedure was employed (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This observation contradicts previous reported findings (Aitken & Sanford, 1969a). However, it should be emphasized that in the work of Aitken & Sanford, a different sensitization procedure was employed (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…It has already been suggested that histamine and 5-HT may have low significance in anaphylaxis of ruminants such as cattle and sheep because antihistaminics and anti-5-HT agents do not effectively suppress the cardio-respiratory features of anaphylactic shock (Aitken & Sanford, 1969a ;Alexander, Eyre, Head & Sanford, 1970). On the other hand kinins and SRS-A may be more important in view of the strong inhibition of the clinical signs of bovine anaphylaxis by sodium meclofenamate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations