This study was designed to investigate the possibility that tracheal epithelium generates a relaxant factor analogous to the endothelial‐derived relaxant factor (EDRF) of vascular tissue. The absence of such a factor following epithelial damage in diseases such as asthma might help to explain the airway hyperreactivity characteristic of such diseases.
Removal of epithelium by rubbing enhanced the sensitivity of guinea‐pig isolated tracheal chains to 5‐hydroxytryptamine, histamine, acetylcholine, adenosine, isoprenaline and also minimally to KC1. Responses to LaCl3 and electrical field stimulation were not affected. Low concentrations of adenosine produced contractions only in tissues denuded of epithelium.
In the presence of indomethacin 1.4 μM or dithiothreitol (DTT) 1 μM, dose‐response curves to histamine were moved to the left in both control and rubbed tissues, and the maximum response was increased. The difference in sensitivity between tissues with and without epithelium was not affected by indomethacin, but was slightly reduced by DTT. Phenidone (0.1 mM) also increased the maximum responses, but increased the sensitivity only of the tissues with intact epithelium, to the same level as that seen in the tissues denuded of epithelium.
Superfusion cascade studies provided no evidence for the generation of a relaxant factor from tracheal epithelium.
It is suggested that the supersensitivity produced by removal of the epithelium is not due to the removal of a relaxant factor, but rather to the removal of a permeability barrier, allowing a greater concentration of agonist at the level of the underlying smooth muscle.
The present supplement summarizes the proceedings of the symposium "Implementing practice guidelines: A workshop on guidelines dissemination and implementation with a focus on asthma and COPD", which took place in Quebec City, Quebec, from April 14 to 16, 2005. This international symposium was a joint initiative of the Laval University Office of Continuing Medical Education (Bureau de la Formation Médicale Continue), the Canadian Thoracic Society and the Canadian Network for Asthma Care, and was supported by many other organizations and by industrial partners. The objectives of this meeting were to examine the optimal implementation of practice guidelines, review current initiatives for the implementation of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines in Canada and in the rest of the world, and develop an optimal strategy for future guideline implementation. An impressive group of scientists, physicians and other health care providers, as well as policy makers and representatives of patients' associations, the pharmaceutical industry, research and health networks, and communications specialists, conveyed their perspectives on how to achieve these goals. This important event provided a unique opportunity for all participants to discuss key issues in improving the care of patients with asthma and COPD. These two diseases are responsible for an enormous human and socioeconomic burden around the world. Many reports have indicated that current evidence-based guidelines are underused by physicians and others, and that there are many barriers to an effective translation of recommendations into day-to-day care. There is therefore a need to develop more effective ways to communicate key information to both caregivers and patients, and to promote appropriate health behaviours. This symposium contributed to the initiation of what could become the "Canadian Asthma and COPD Campaign", aimed at improving care and, hence, the quality of life of those suffering from these diseases. It is hoped that this event will be followed by other meetings that focus on how to improve the transfer of key recommendations from evidence-based guidelines into current care, and how to stimulate research to accomplish this.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.