2023
DOI: 10.1002/wea.4381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiences of co‐producing sub‐seasonal forecast products for agricultural application in Kenya and Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach shifts the user, in this context the conservation practitioner, from a recipient of forecast information to a participant in the knowledge and service generation process (Vincent et al, 2020), for instance, drawing on conservation practitioners' understanding of species' ecology to define relevant forecast thresholds and early actions, thereby increasing the likelihood that bespoke forecast information is 'useful, usable and used' (Boaz & Hayden, 2002;Hirons et al, 2021). For example, this could involve user-directed iterations to the visualisation, communication or content of forecasts (Gudoshava et al, 2022;Hirons et al, 2023;Lawal et al, 2021) or applying user-defined thresholds for specific decisionmaking applications (Dione et al, 2022). However, it is also increasingly clear that the iterative co-production process itself is extremely resource intensive (Hirons et al, 2021) and to be effective, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and evaluation need to be institutionalised as the operational norm (Visman et al, 2022).…”
Section: (Correct Negatives)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach shifts the user, in this context the conservation practitioner, from a recipient of forecast information to a participant in the knowledge and service generation process (Vincent et al, 2020), for instance, drawing on conservation practitioners' understanding of species' ecology to define relevant forecast thresholds and early actions, thereby increasing the likelihood that bespoke forecast information is 'useful, usable and used' (Boaz & Hayden, 2002;Hirons et al, 2021). For example, this could involve user-directed iterations to the visualisation, communication or content of forecasts (Gudoshava et al, 2022;Hirons et al, 2023;Lawal et al, 2021) or applying user-defined thresholds for specific decisionmaking applications (Dione et al, 2022). However, it is also increasingly clear that the iterative co-production process itself is extremely resource intensive (Hirons et al, 2021) and to be effective, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and evaluation need to be institutionalised as the operational norm (Visman et al, 2022).…”
Section: (Correct Negatives)mentioning
confidence: 99%