2022
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experience and maturation: The contribution of co‐occurrence regularities in language to the development of semantic organization

Abstract: With development knowledge becomes organized according to semantic links, including early-developing associative (e.g., juicy-apple) and gradually-developing taxonomic links (e.g., apple-pear). Word co-occurrence regularities may foster these links: Associative links may form from direct co-occurrence (e.g., juicy-apple), and taxonomic links from shared co-occurrence (e.g., apple and pear co-occur with juicy). Four experiments (2017-2020) investigated this possibility with 4-8-year-olds (N =148, 82 female) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research on monolingual young children suggests that when they encounter a new word, it initially represents an episodic experience but must undergo integration into their mental lexicon for effective communication (Sobczak and Gaskell, 2019;Tartaro et al, 2021). Research also showed that monolingual children undergo a developmental transition from initially prioritizing thematic relations, rooted in word co-occurrence patterns, to later emphasizing taxonomic relationships based on shared characteristics (Nelson and Nelson, 1990;Unger et al, 2016;Savic et al, 2023). Initially, children tend to prioritize thematic relations, connecting words like "dog" with "bone" or "bark" because of frequent co-occurrence in their experiences.…”
Section: Semantic Development In Heritage Bilingual Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on monolingual young children suggests that when they encounter a new word, it initially represents an episodic experience but must undergo integration into their mental lexicon for effective communication (Sobczak and Gaskell, 2019;Tartaro et al, 2021). Research also showed that monolingual children undergo a developmental transition from initially prioritizing thematic relations, rooted in word co-occurrence patterns, to later emphasizing taxonomic relationships based on shared characteristics (Nelson and Nelson, 1990;Unger et al, 2016;Savic et al, 2023). Initially, children tend to prioritize thematic relations, connecting words like "dog" with "bone" or "bark" because of frequent co-occurrence in their experiences.…”
Section: Semantic Development In Heritage Bilingual Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, for the pure distributional cue on its own, it is not clear that there is any additional information (syntactic or extra-linguistic) that would help children induce the conceptual hierarchy beyond information about word co-occurrence. On this account, the accumulation of direct co-occurrence in children's memory (e.g., "fruits"-"hungry" and "vegetables"-"hungry") leads to the realization (perhaps triggered by cognitive maturation, e.g., Bauer & San Souci, 2010;Savic, et al, 2023) that some words share similar pattern of co-occurrence (e.g., that "fruits" and "vegetables" co-occur in similar linguistic contexts; in this example, they both co-occur with "hungry"), which then foster the creation of a taxonomic -rather than a thematic -link (i.e., "fruits" and "vegetables" are instances of a single higher-level conceptual category, e.g., "food") (Brown & Berko, 1960;Ervin, 1961;McNeill, 1963;Sloutsky et al, 2017). It is still not entirely clear what precise mechanistic process can explain how sensitivity to shared patterns of co-occurrence between two labels may give rise to a taxonomic link relating these labels to a single superordinate category, supporting conceptual inference and knowledge generalization.…”
Section: Possible Learning Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still not entirely clear what precise mechanistic process can explain how sensitivity to shared patterns of co-occurrence between two labels may give rise to a taxonomic link relating these labels to a single superordinate category, supporting conceptual inference and knowledge generalization. We refer the reader to Unger CONCEPTUAL HIERARCHY IN CDS 20 and Fisher (2021) and Savic et al (2023) for a review and discussion of some hypothesized mechanisms based on behavioral, computational, and/or neuroscientific evidence.…”
Section: Possible Learning Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%