2017
DOI: 10.17116/patol201779310-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansion of secretory cells in the fallopian tubal epithelium in the early stages of the pathogenesis of ovarian serous carcinomas

Abstract: SCE was shown to be an independent intraepithelial lesion. The incidence of this abnormality increased with age and significantly differed in the patients with fallopian tubal lesions in extraovarian diseases from that in those with malignant ovarian serous tumors (by 5.3 times), while these groups showed a three-fold difference in SCO. Thus, SCP may serve as a more sensitive marker for the early stages of the pathogenesis of ovarian serous carcinoma. The studied types of SCE demonstrated multiple molecular ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until recently, only STIC lesions were considered to be bona fide early precursors to HGSOC because of the existence of matching STIC and HGSOC site-specific TP53 mutations which strongly suggested the same lineage identity ( 20 ). However, the recent discovery of matching site-specific TP53 mutations between other ESPs and HGSOC as well as associations between ESPs and the increased risk of HGSOC ( 3 , 22 , 23 ) led to the “precursor escape” theory in which ESPs undergo malignant transformation after shedding into the peritoneal cavity, thus bypassing the formation of STIC lesions in the fallopian tube as a required intermediate step to HGSOC ( 24 ). Genomic profiling did not reveal significant differences between HGSOC with and without STIC lesions ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until recently, only STIC lesions were considered to be bona fide early precursors to HGSOC because of the existence of matching STIC and HGSOC site-specific TP53 mutations which strongly suggested the same lineage identity ( 20 ). However, the recent discovery of matching site-specific TP53 mutations between other ESPs and HGSOC as well as associations between ESPs and the increased risk of HGSOC ( 3 , 22 , 23 ) led to the “precursor escape” theory in which ESPs undergo malignant transformation after shedding into the peritoneal cavity, thus bypassing the formation of STIC lesions in the fallopian tube as a required intermediate step to HGSOC ( 24 ). Genomic profiling did not reveal significant differences between HGSOC with and without STIC lesions ( 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, only STIC lesions were thought to be the true fallopian tube precursor to HGSOC as they have similar morphologic and molecular features ( 19 21 ). However, ovarian cancer risk has been associated with other potential early serous precursors (ESPs) that have a benign appearance and a low proliferative index and do not satisfy the criteria of a STIC diagnosis ( 3 , 9 , 22 24 ). These ESPs include: serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) ( 17 ), which are characterized by lower Ki67 positivity and less cytologic atypia than STIC ( 16 , 18 ), p53 signatures defined as a single layer of >12 consecutive secretory cells with aberrant p53 expression ( 7 , 25 , 26 ), benign secretory cell outgrowth (SCOUT) defined as a continuous run of >30 secretory cells ( 3 , 5 , 9 , 22 , 23 , 27 ), and secretory cell expansion (SCE) defined as a continuous run of >10 secretory cells with normal p53 expression ( 3 , 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of cilia is most pronounced in the ampulla of the uterine tube, where the thickness of the subserosa is up to five times smaller than the isthmus [6,13]. According to many authors, the contraction of the subserosa help to captures the egg by fimbriae [2,4,19]. Other authors believe that the frequency of cilia movement influences the speed of movement of the egg and the embryo [8,16,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%