2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9040638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expanded Douglas–Peucker Polygonal Approximation and Opposite Angle-Based Exact Cell Decomposition for Path Planning with Curvilinear Obstacles

Abstract: The Expanded Douglas–Peucker (EDP) polygonal approximation algorithm and its application method for the Opposite Angle-Based Exact Cell Decomposition (OAECD) are proposed for the mobile robot path-planning problem with curvilinear obstacles. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with the existing Douglas–Peucker (DP) polygonal approximation and vertical cell decomposition algorithm. The experimental results show that the path generated by the OAECD algorithm with EDP approximation appears much … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Map 3 in Figure 10 c seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and completeness of the path-planning algorithm and is an environment that is unfavorable to random sampling path-planning algorithms such as the RRT algorithm. Map 4 in Figure 10 d seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and the planning time for the path-planning algorithm, and the cell decomposition algorithm, which increases the computation cost as the angle of obstacle increases, is an unfavorable environment [ 29 ]. Map 5 in Figure 10 e seems to be an environment in which it is also easy to verify the optimality and planning time of the path-planning algorithm; for the same reason as Map 4, the cell decomposition algorithm is an unfavorable environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Map 3 in Figure 10 c seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and completeness of the path-planning algorithm and is an environment that is unfavorable to random sampling path-planning algorithms such as the RRT algorithm. Map 4 in Figure 10 d seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and the planning time for the path-planning algorithm, and the cell decomposition algorithm, which increases the computation cost as the angle of obstacle increases, is an unfavorable environment [ 29 ]. Map 5 in Figure 10 e seems to be an environment in which it is also easy to verify the optimality and planning time of the path-planning algorithm; for the same reason as Map 4, the cell decomposition algorithm is an unfavorable environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Map 3 in Figure 10 (c) seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and completeness of the path-planning algorithm and is an environment that is unfavorable to random sampling path-planning algorithms such as the RRT algorithm. Map 4 in Figure 10 (d) seems to be an environment in which it is easy to verify the optimality and the planning time for the pathplanning algorithm, and the Cell Decomposition algorithm, which increases the computation cost as the angle of obstacle increases, is an unfavorable environment [29]. Map 5 in Figure 10 (e) seems to be an environment in which it is also easy to verify the optimality and planning time of the pathplanning algorithm; for the same reason as Map 4, the cell decomposition algorithm is an unfavorable environment.…”
Section: Experimental Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path planning is a challenging issue in robotic tasks. Jung et al [29] proposed a new path planning method to handle curvilinear obstacles. Zeng et al [30] presented reinforcement learning with subgoal graphs, leading to near-optimal subgoal sequences as motion-planning policies.…”
Section: Advanced Mobile Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%