2015
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excessive Corneal Flattening and Thinning After Corneal Cross-linking

Abstract: This is the first case report of significant progressive corneal flattening and thinning after undergoing CXL treatment for progressive keratoconus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Approximately one-third of eyes included in our study presented a flattening in keratometric values higher than 1.00 D at different follow-up time points. As previously shown in the literature, 1,11,12,[14][15][16] we were expecting an even more intense remodeling effect in this group comprising eyes with more remarkable signs of topographic abnormality and advanced stages of disease. Corneas that present signs of more severe disease (topographically represented by steeper corneas 11,12,[14][15][16] ) are theoretically more likely to present an intense remodeling effect, with a marked ongoing remodeling effect that could last years after the procedure 12 and reaching values up to 14.00 D. 12 This effect may vary with the concentration of riboflavin in the stroma and also with the UVA exposure time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Approximately one-third of eyes included in our study presented a flattening in keratometric values higher than 1.00 D at different follow-up time points. As previously shown in the literature, 1,11,12,[14][15][16] we were expecting an even more intense remodeling effect in this group comprising eyes with more remarkable signs of topographic abnormality and advanced stages of disease. Corneas that present signs of more severe disease (topographically represented by steeper corneas 11,12,[14][15][16] ) are theoretically more likely to present an intense remodeling effect, with a marked ongoing remodeling effect that could last years after the procedure 12 and reaching values up to 14.00 D. 12 This effect may vary with the concentration of riboflavin in the stroma and also with the UVA exposure time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As previously shown in the literature, 1,11,12,[14][15][16] we were expecting an even more intense remodeling effect in this group comprising eyes with more remarkable signs of topographic abnormality and advanced stages of disease. Corneas that present signs of more severe disease (topographically represented by steeper corneas 11,12,[14][15][16] ) are theoretically more likely to present an intense remodeling effect, with a marked ongoing remodeling effect that could last years after the procedure 12 and reaching values up to 14.00 D. 12 This effect may vary with the concentration of riboflavin in the stroma and also with the UVA exposure time. 17 Previous studies have demonstrated that the combination of increase in regional tissue elastic modulus, 18,19 the effective depth of CXL, 18 and central cone location 19,20 probably explains the localized flattening effect of the cornea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…When we analyze the relationship of the differences at the initial and final values between C grade and Kmax values, the change in C grade in the Kmax <2 D flattening group approached meaningfulness at most but no significant difference was obtained (Table 5). Hence, the greater amount of pachymetric thinning in this group might have developed as a result of excessive corneal thinning rather than the severity of the disease, as previously reported by Kymonis et al (20).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Kymionis reported a case of excessive corneal flattening following treatment of progressive KCN with conventional CXL. 129 During the 5 year follow-up, the patient demonstrated significant corneal flattening (11.1 D change in spherical equivalent) and thinning (from a preoperative value of 464 μm to 243 μm).…”
Section: Complications Of CXLmentioning
confidence: 89%