Data Mining Applications in Engineering and Medicine 2012
DOI: 10.5772/50893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examples of the Use of Data Mining Methods in Animal Breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MARS data mining algorithm has been used typically in the classification of the binary output variable in literature (Grzesiak and Zaborski, 2012). However, in our study, MARS data mining algorithm was used for the first time in the body weight prediction of the Mengali rams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MARS data mining algorithm has been used typically in the classification of the binary output variable in literature (Grzesiak and Zaborski, 2012). However, in our study, MARS data mining algorithm was used for the first time in the body weight prediction of the Mengali rams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MARS (multivariate adaptive regression spline) has not been fit so far about the prediction of body R. Bras. Zootec., 46(11): [863][864][865][866][867][868][869][870][871][872]2017 weight in sheep husbandry, although Grzesiak and Zaborski (2012) applied CART, CHAID, and some ANN algorithms on animal data for lactation milk yield and dystocia in dairy cattle. When the above-mentioned advantages are considered in the scope of sheep breeding, there is growing interest on data mining and artificial neural networks with respect to the weight prediction from morphological traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these algorithms, the estimation of SD ratio value smaller than 0.40 was an indicator of the good fit means [12,26,27] . Both MAD and RMSE produced nearly equal values, coefficient of determination were found equal for both algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ele alınan karar ağacı algoritmalarının sınıflama performanslarının ölçülmesinde, genel doğru sınıflama oranı (general classification accuracy ratio), başarısız olan firmaların doğru sınıflama oranı (sensitivity) ve başarılı olan firmaların doğru sınıflama oranı (specificity) ölçütleri kullanılmıştır (Grzesiak and Zaborski, 2012). Tüm istatistiksel değerlendirmeler IBM SPSS 23 programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır.…”
Section: Araştırmanın Değişkenleriunclassified