2015
DOI: 10.28945/2126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining Factors Predicting Students’ Digital Competence

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine factors predicting lower secondary school students’ digital competence and to explore differences between students when it comes to digital competence. Results from a digital competence test and survey in lower secondary school will be presented. It is important to learn more about and investigate what characterizes students’ digital competence. A sample of 852 ninth-grade Norwegian students from 38 schools participated in the study. The students answered a 26 item mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large, global body of research about the use of digital technology in secondary schools (e.g., Hohlfeld et al, 2017;Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015). Access to physical hardware and infrastructure (Dolan, 2016) as well as the digital competence of teachers (Starkey, 2020) and pupils (Hatlevik et al, 2015), have all been identified as key components that support the use of digital technology in schools. Yet, school is a complicated object to study given its various administrative levels, actors and role as a societal institution (Ilomäki & Lakkala, 2018).…”
Section: The Innovative Digital School Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large, global body of research about the use of digital technology in secondary schools (e.g., Hohlfeld et al, 2017;Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015). Access to physical hardware and infrastructure (Dolan, 2016) as well as the digital competence of teachers (Starkey, 2020) and pupils (Hatlevik et al, 2015), have all been identified as key components that support the use of digital technology in schools. Yet, school is a complicated object to study given its various administrative levels, actors and role as a societal institution (Ilomäki & Lakkala, 2018).…”
Section: The Innovative Digital School Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others based their studies on previous skills research on that particular antecedent (e.g. Hatlevik et al, 2015). The case of ethnicity also exemplifies a common distinction, whereby some studies aim to test multiple possible antecedents of digital skills in order to determine which were more influential, 13 while others focused on just one antecedent, providing a literature review to support either one or a few hypotheses.…”
Section: The Synthesis Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con base en la ley de Lotka, se confirma que en este campo los productores son ocasionales, ya que, todos ellos cuentan con tan solo una publicación, excepto Gréta Börjk Gudmundóttir de la Universitetet i Oslo (Hardersen y Gudmundsdóttir, 2012;Hatlevik et al, 2015) y Rosa García-Ruiz de la Universidad de Cantabria (Amor et al, 2015;García-Ruiz et al, 2014;García-Ruiz et al, 2020) que han colaborado en dos y tres artículos respectivamente.…”
Section: Figura 2 Artículos Por Año (Scopus Y Web Of Science)unclassified